Detection of small for gestational age fetuses by the combination of clinical risk factors and ultrasonography
- PMID: 2029959
- DOI: 10.1016/0028-2243(91)90134-7
Detection of small for gestational age fetuses by the combination of clinical risk factors and ultrasonography
Abstract
Clinical risk factors of fetal growth retardation and targeted ultrasound examinations were combined to detect small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses below the 10th percentile weight for age in 1122 unselected singleton pregnancies, in which the true gestational age was confirmed by ultrasonography at 18 weeks. The prevalence of SGA infants was 6.0% in this population. A risk group of 236 (21%) mothers was referred for an ultrasound examination of fetal growth by the midwives of maternity welfare centers on the basis of low symphysis-fundal height or five other major maternal risk factors (pregnancy associated hypertension, loss of weight gain, a previous SGA infant, pre-pregnancy weight below 50 kg, any smoking during pregnancy). The sensitivity and positive predictive value of the clinical part of the study were 83.6 and 23.7%, respectively. Fetal growth was assessed by measuring both biparietal diameter (BPD) and transverse abdominal diameter. In the clinically selected risk group, 83.9% of the SGA fetuses could be detected by this method using a cutoff level of -1 standard deviation (SD). The two-step screening combining clinical and ultrasonographic methods in the detection of SGA fetuses in general population showed a sensitivity of 70.1%, a specificity of 95.5%, a positive predictive value of 49.5%, and a negative predictive value of 98.1%. After ultrasound examination, the definitive risk group for SGA was 8.5% of the total material of 1122.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Routine ultrasound screening for early detection of small for gestational age fetuses.Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Apr;71(4):518-21. Obstet Gynecol. 1988. PMID: 3281072
-
Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Oct;193:10-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Jul 2. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015. PMID: 26207980
-
Effectiveness of detection of intrauterine growth retardation by abdominal palpation as screening test in a low risk population: an observational study.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Oct 15;116(2):164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.01.037. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004. PMID: 15358457
-
Fetal growth velocity and body proportion in the assessment of growth.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S700-S711.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.014. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29422209 Review.
-
Blood-based biomarkers in the maternal circulation associated with fetal growth restriction.Prenat Diagn. 2019 Oct;39(11):947-957. doi: 10.1002/pd.5525. Epub 2019 Jul 22. Prenat Diagn. 2019. PMID: 31299098 Review.
Cited by
-
Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 14;5(5):CD012245. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012245.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31087568 Free PMC article.
-
Routine weighing during antenatal visits.BMJ. 1992 Feb 22;304(6825):460. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6825.460. BMJ. 1992. PMID: 1547413 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Care-related factors associated with antepartal diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: a case-control study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Oct 31;14:371. doi: 10.1186/s12884-014-0371-5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014. PMID: 25363152 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical