Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Apr;44(4):321-5.
doi: 10.1136/jcp.44.4.321.

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction in swabs and urine from men with non-gonococcal urethritis

Affiliations

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction in swabs and urine from men with non-gonococcal urethritis

H M Palmer et al. J Clin Pathol. 1991 Apr.

Abstract

A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was developed for Chlamydia trachomatis in which a 380 base pair DNA fragment was amplified. Amplification occurred with the DNA from the 15 serovars but not with that from other Chlamydia spp or with DNA from a variety of other organisms. Chlamydial DNA (10(-16) g) could be detected and the PCR seemed to be able to detect single organisms. Urethral swabs were obtained from 37 men with acute non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU), 18 (49%) of whom were positive for C trachomatis by MicroTrak. As a result of clinical re-examinations 65 urethral swabs were available for analysis by the PCR. In comparison with MicroTrak, PCR had a sensitivity of 95%, a specificity of 94%, a positive predictive value of 86% and a negative predictive value of 98%. The PCR was apparently less sensitive (82%) in tests on urine samples. Overall, however, values of sensitivity and specificity of the PCR compared favourably with those of MicroTrak. The PCR for C trachomatis is likely to be a valuable technique for research, but problems of DNA contamination suggest that it should not be recommended for routine diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1991 Jan 15;61(2-3):199-203 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pathol. 1991 Jan;44(1):1-5 - PubMed
    1. Br Med Bull. 1983 Apr;39(2):168-74 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1984 Jan;100(1):47-51 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pathol. 1984 Jul;37(7):812-6 - PubMed