Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar 19:8:30.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-30.

Quality of life measurement in women with cervical cancer: implications for Chinese cervical cancer survivors

Affiliations

Quality of life measurement in women with cervical cancer: implications for Chinese cervical cancer survivors

Ying Chun Zeng et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: Women with cervical cancer now have relatively good 5-year survival rates. Better survival rates have driven the paradigm in cancer care from a medical illness model to a wellness model, which is concerned with the quality of women's lives as well as the length of survival. Thus, the assessment of quality of life among cervical cancer survivors is increasingly paramount for healthcare professionals. The purposes of this review were to describe existing validated quality of life instruments used in cervical cancer survivors, and to reveal the implications of quality of life measurement for Chinese cervical cancer survivors.

Methods: A literature search of five electronic databases was conducted using the terms cervical/cervix cancer, quality of life, survivors, survivorship, measurement, and instruments. Articles published in either English or Chinese from January 2000 to June 2009 were searched. Only those adopting an established quality of life instrument for use in cervical cancer survivors were included.

Results: A total of 11 validated multidimensional quality of life instruments were identified from 41 articles. These instruments could be classified into four categories: generic, cancer-specific, cancer site-specific and cancer survivor-specific instruments. With internal consistency varying from 0.68-0.99, the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.60-0.95 based on the test of the Pearson coefficient. One or more types of validity supported the construct validity. Although all these instruments met the minimum requirements of reliability and validity, the original versions of these instruments were mainly in English.

Conclusion: Selection of an instrument should consider the purpose of investigation, take its psychometric properties into account, and consider the instrument's origin and comprehensiveness. As quality of life can be affected by culture, studies assessing the quality of life of cervical cancer survivors in China or other non-English speaking countries should choose or develop instruments relevant to their own cultural context. There is a need to develop a comprehensive quality of life instrument for Chinese cervical cancer survivors across the whole survivorship, including immediately after diagnosis and for short- (less than 5 years) and long-term (more than 5 years) survivorship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of search and selection process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. China Cancer Database. The epidemiology of cervical cancer. Beijing China. http://cancernet.cicams.ac.cn/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=23&I... Accessed on 2/11/2008.
    1. Yin XH, Zhou BB, Zhu CP. The impact factors and interventions on quality of life among cervical cancer patients. Med J CASC. 2004;6:78–79. [in Chinese]
    1. Wolff SN. In: Handbook of Cancer Survivorship. Feuerstein M, editor. New York: Springer; 2007. The burden of cancer survivorship: A pandemic of treatment success; pp. 7–18. full_text.
    1. Gotay C. In: Handbook of Cancer Control and Behavioral Science: A Resource for Researchers, Practitioners, and Policymakers. Miller SM, Bowen DJ, Croyle RT, Rowland JH, editor. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2009. Quality of life assessment in cancer; pp. 115–128.
    1. Dow KH, Ferrell BR, Haberman MR, Eaton L. The meaning of quality of life in cancer survivorship. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999;26:519–528. - PubMed