Quality of life measurement in women with cervical cancer: implications for Chinese cervical cancer survivors
- PMID: 20302624
- PMCID: PMC2852383
- DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-30
Quality of life measurement in women with cervical cancer: implications for Chinese cervical cancer survivors
Abstract
Background: Women with cervical cancer now have relatively good 5-year survival rates. Better survival rates have driven the paradigm in cancer care from a medical illness model to a wellness model, which is concerned with the quality of women's lives as well as the length of survival. Thus, the assessment of quality of life among cervical cancer survivors is increasingly paramount for healthcare professionals. The purposes of this review were to describe existing validated quality of life instruments used in cervical cancer survivors, and to reveal the implications of quality of life measurement for Chinese cervical cancer survivors.
Methods: A literature search of five electronic databases was conducted using the terms cervical/cervix cancer, quality of life, survivors, survivorship, measurement, and instruments. Articles published in either English or Chinese from January 2000 to June 2009 were searched. Only those adopting an established quality of life instrument for use in cervical cancer survivors were included.
Results: A total of 11 validated multidimensional quality of life instruments were identified from 41 articles. These instruments could be classified into four categories: generic, cancer-specific, cancer site-specific and cancer survivor-specific instruments. With internal consistency varying from 0.68-0.99, the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.60-0.95 based on the test of the Pearson coefficient. One or more types of validity supported the construct validity. Although all these instruments met the minimum requirements of reliability and validity, the original versions of these instruments were mainly in English.
Conclusion: Selection of an instrument should consider the purpose of investigation, take its psychometric properties into account, and consider the instrument's origin and comprehensiveness. As quality of life can be affected by culture, studies assessing the quality of life of cervical cancer survivors in China or other non-English speaking countries should choose or develop instruments relevant to their own cultural context. There is a need to develop a comprehensive quality of life instrument for Chinese cervical cancer survivors across the whole survivorship, including immediately after diagnosis and for short- (less than 5 years) and long-term (more than 5 years) survivorship.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9. Encephale. 2004. PMID: 15627048 Review. French.
-
The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure.Med Care. 1998 Jul;36(7):1002-12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199807000-00007. Med Care. 1998. PMID: 9674618
-
Content comparison of unmet needs self-report measures for lymphoma cancer survivors: A systematic review.PLoS One. 2023 Dec 15;18(12):e0290729. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290729. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38100450 Free PMC article.
-
Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors.Qual Life Res. 1995 Dec;4(6):523-31. doi: 10.1007/BF00634747. Qual Life Res. 1995. PMID: 8556012
-
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite questionnaire for health-related quality of life in prostate cancer patients.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Dec 6;14(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0571-y. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016. PMID: 27923377 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Associations between living arrangements and health-related quality of life of urban elderly people: a study from China.Qual Life Res. 2011 Apr;20(3):359-69. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9752-z. Epub 2010 Sep 30. Qual Life Res. 2011. PMID: 20878548
-
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cervix (FACT-Cx) measuring health-related quality of life.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012 Oct 3;10:124. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-10-124. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012. PMID: 23031680 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of different surgical approaches on survival outcomes in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: protocol for a multicentre longitudinal study in China.BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 20;10(8):e038020. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038020. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32819996 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Results in Higher Recurrence Rate Versus Open Abdominal Surgery for Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer Patients With Tumor Size Less Than 2 Centimeter: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.Front Oncol. 2021 Jun 10;11:683231. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.683231. eCollection 2021. Front Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34178675 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of Life and Stress-Related Psychological Distress Among Patients with Cervical Cancer: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Diseases. 2025 Feb 25;13(3):70. doi: 10.3390/diseases13030070. Diseases. 2025. PMID: 40136610 Free PMC article.
References
-
- China Cancer Database. The epidemiology of cervical cancer. Beijing China. http://cancernet.cicams.ac.cn/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=23&I... Accessed on 2/11/2008.
-
- Yin XH, Zhou BB, Zhu CP. The impact factors and interventions on quality of life among cervical cancer patients. Med J CASC. 2004;6:78–79. [in Chinese]
-
- Wolff SN. In: Handbook of Cancer Survivorship. Feuerstein M, editor. New York: Springer; 2007. The burden of cancer survivorship: A pandemic of treatment success; pp. 7–18. full_text.
-
- Gotay C. In: Handbook of Cancer Control and Behavioral Science: A Resource for Researchers, Practitioners, and Policymakers. Miller SM, Bowen DJ, Croyle RT, Rowland JH, editor. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2009. Quality of life assessment in cancer; pp. 115–128.
-
- Dow KH, Ferrell BR, Haberman MR, Eaton L. The meaning of quality of life in cancer survivorship. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999;26:519–528. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous