Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Apr;20(2):183-90.
doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Mar 19.

Top-down control of visual attention

Affiliations
Review

Top-down control of visual attention

Behrad Noudoost et al. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Top-down visual attention improves perception of selected stimuli and that improvement is reflected in the neural activity at many stages throughout the visual system. Recent studies of top-down attention have elaborated on the signatures of its effects within visual cortex and have begun identifying its causal basis. Evidence from these studies suggests that the correlates of spatial attention exhibited by neurons within the visual system originate from a distributed network of structures involved in the programming of saccadic eye movements. We summarize this evidence and discuss its relationship to the neural mechanisms of spatial working memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of recent findings from studies comparing the timing of attention effects in different cortical areas. Each row represents a separate study. “formula image” indicates shorter time difference compared to “formula image” for the same study.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Possible routes for attentional signals from frontal and parietal areas (FEF and LIP) to an exemplar visual area (V4). Top, cytoarchitecture of area V4 and laminar patterns of afferent (left) and efferent (right) connections. Corticocortical feedback projections (from FEF, LIP, IT) synapse in superficial and deep layers [55, 58]. Specific pulvinar projections synapse primarily in deep layer 3 [83] while nonspecific pulvinar projections synapse in Layer 1 [61]. Feedforward input from visual areas such as V1 and V2 synapses primarily in Layer 4 [84]. Layer 2/3 neurons project to higher cortical areas such as IT [85], Layer 5 neurons project to subcortical structures such as the SC [86] and striatum [87], and Layer 6 neurons project to earlier cortical areas such as V1 and V2 [88] as well as to the pulvinar thalamus [61]. Bottom, selected projections forming paths from FEF and/or LIP to V4. These routes include: direct projections from LIP and FEF to V4 [55, 58, 59]; indirect projections through higher cortical areas such as IT [59, 88]; through SC and pulvinar thalamus [89]; through SC and lower visual areas including LGN, V1, and V2 [90]; or through BF cholinergic nuclei [91]. Abbreviations: FEF, Frontal Eye Field; LIP, Lateral Intraparietal area; IT, inferotemporal cortex; SC, superior colliculus; LGN, lateral geniculate nucleus; Pulv., pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus; BF, basal forebrain nuclei.

References

    1. McAlonan K, Cavanaugh J, Wurtz RH. Guarding the gateway to cortex with attention in visual thalamus. Nature. 2008:456391–394. This study provided evidence for Francis Crick s conjecture that “if the thalamus is the gateway to the cortex, the reticular complex might be described as the guardian of the gateway. McAlonan et al. found that attention increases visual responses of both mango and parvocellular neurons in lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of monkeys while it decreases the response in thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN). Latency of visual response was 21 ms shorter in magnocellular part of LGN compared to TRN whereas attentional modulation appeared 4 ms sooner in TRN. This result shows that attention modulates visual signals in TRN and LGN before they even reach cortex and suggests the LGN-TRN circuit as a gateway for flow of visual information throughout the cortex. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petersen SE, Robinson DL, Morris JD. Contributions of the pulvinar to visual spatial attention. Neuropsychologia. 1987:2597. - PubMed
    1. Ignashchenkova A, Dicke PW, Haarmeier T, Thier P. Neuron-specific contribution of the superior colliculus to overt and covert shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience. 2004:756–64. - PubMed
    1. McAdams CJ, Maunsell JHR. Effects of Attention on Orientation-Tuning Functions of Single Neurons in Macaque Cortical Area V4. Journal of Neuroscience. 1999:19431–441. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herrero JL, Roberts MJ, Delicato LS, Gieselmann MA, Dayan P, Thiele A. Acetylcholine contributes through muscarinic receptors to attentional modulation in V1. Nature. 2008:4541110–1114. This study reported evidence of a selective role of muscarinic acetylcholine (Ach) receptors in attentional modulation of V1 responses. The authors iontophorically delivered Ach into V1 sites and found increased attentional modulation. They also found that the muscarinic antagonist of Ach reduced the modulation while the nicotinic antagonist did not affect it. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances