How do changes in pain severity levels correspond to changes in health status and function in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy?
- PMID: 20303665
- DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.09.017
How do changes in pain severity levels correspond to changes in health status and function in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy?
Abstract
The current analysis compares changes in pain with changes in function and health status in individuals with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). The post hoc analysis is based on a 12week, multinational, placebo-controlled trial of pregabalin in which 401 patients were randomized to treatment. Study measures included the Brief Pain Inventory short-form (BPI-sf), EQ-5D and other patient-reported outcomes. Cutpoints were derived on the BPI-sf 0-10 average pain numeric rating scale [NRS] to classify pain grades of "mild" (1-3), moderate (4-6) and severe (7-10), adjusting for geographical regions where data were collected. Two different metrics were used to classify the importance of change in pain severity from baseline to 12weeks: changes in pain severity grades (defined by cutpoint categories) and percent reduction in the NRS (categories ranging from 0-9% to 50%). An improvement in one pain grade or a 30% reduction in the NRS served as determinants of a clinically important difference. Patients with a one-grade reduction in pain severity, either from "severe-to-moderate" or "moderate-to-mild," had a 3-point improvement the BPI-sf Pain Interference Index (PII; a composite measure of function); a reduction from "severe-to-mild" pain corresponded to a 6-point improvement in the PII. Similarly, a reduction in the NRS of 30% and 50% corresponded to a 3-point and a 5-point improvement in the PII, respectively. Changes in pain were also associated with changes in health status. Results suggest that patients whose pain is not reduced to a mild level of severity can still experience clinically important changes in function and health status.
Copyright 2009 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Cut-points for the measurement of pain: the choice depends on what you want to study.Pain. 2010 May;149(2):163-164. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.03.013. Epub 2010 Mar 26. Pain. 2010. PMID: 20347224 No abstract available.
References
-
- Anderson KO. Role of cutpoints: why grade pain intensity? [comment]. Pain. 2005;113:5-6.
-
- Argoff CE, Backonja MM, Belgrade MJ, Bennett GJ, Clark MR, Cole BE, Fishbain DA, Irving G, McCarberg BH, McLean MJ. Consensus guidelines: treatment planning and options. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:S12-S25.
-
- Argoff CE, Cole BE, Fishbain DA, Irving GA. Diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: clinical and quality-of-life issues. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;4:S3-S11.
-
- Bonomi AE, Cella DF, Hahn EA, Bjordal K, Sperner-Unterweger B, Gangeri L, Bergman B, Willems-Groot J, Hanquet P, Zittoun R. Multilingual translation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system. Qual Life Res. 1996;5:309-320.
-
- Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37:53-72.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
