Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr;139(4):860-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.12.038.

Where does atrial fibrillation surgery fail? Implications for increasing effectiveness of ablation

Affiliations
Free article

Where does atrial fibrillation surgery fail? Implications for increasing effectiveness of ablation

Patrick M McCarthy et al. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation is generally safe and effective, but atrial fibrillation redevelops in approximately 20% of patients. We sought to determine anatomic factors, technology factors, or both that contribute to these failures.

Methods: Four hundred eight patients underwent 5 types of atrial fibrillation ablation depending on their atrial fibrillation history and need for concomitant surgical intervention: the classic maze procedure, high-intensity focused ultrasound, the left atrial maze procedure, the biatrial maze procedure, and pulmonary vein isolation. Ninety-five percent of patients with preoperative atrial fibrillation underwent surgical ablation.

Results: Patients undergoing high-intensity focused ultrasound had a high rate of late postoperative percutaneous ablation (37.5%) after surgical intervention (P < .001 vs the other groups). At last follow-up, freedom from atrial fibrillation and need for ablation was as follows: classic maze procedure, 90%; high-intensity focused ultrasound, 43%; left atrial maze procedure, 79%; biatrial maze procedure, 79%; and pulmonary vein isolation, 69% (P < .001 between groups). For those with atrial fibrillation, mapping and ablation were performed in 23.6% (n = 27), and all patients with high-intensity focused ultrasound had failure of the box lesion around the pulmonary veins. Of those with just the left atrial maze procedure or pulmonary vein isolation, the right atrium was the source for failure in 75% (6/8).

Conclusions: Patients undergoing high-intensity focused ultrasound had a high need for postoperative ablation and low freedom from atrial fibrillation. The classic maze procedure had the best results. Left atrial ablation might allow failure from right atrial foci. Matching the technology and lesion set to the patient yields good results and can be applied in 95% of patients. We suggest others obtain late catheter ablation to correct remaining atrial fibrillation, and add to the paucity of late data regarding failure mode.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Cutting Through the Edges.
    Harky A, Bithas C, Chan JSK, Snosi M, Pousios D, Muir AD. Harky A, et al. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jun 1;35(3):375-386. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0057. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020. PMID: 32549109 Free PMC article. Review.
  • 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary.
    Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, Chen PS, Chen SA, Chung MK, Nielsen JC, Curtis AB, Davies DW, Day JD, d'Avila A, de Groot NMSN, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Ellinor PT, Ernst S, Fenelon G, Gerstenfeld EP, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Helm RH, Hylek E, Jackman WM, Jalife J, Kalman JM, Kautzner J, Kottkamp H, Kuck KH, Kumagai K, Lee R, Lewalter T, Lindsay BD, Macle L, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, Michaud GF, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Okumura K, Packer D, Pokushalov E, Reynolds MR, Sanders P, Scanavacca M, Schilling R, Tondo C, Tsao HM, Verma A, Wilber DJ, Yamane T. Calkins H, et al. Europace. 2018 Jan 1;20(1):157-208. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux275. Europace. 2018. PMID: 29016841 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
  • Electrophysiological study 6 months after Epicor™ high-intensity focused ultrasound atrial fibrillation ablation.
    Garcia R, Sacher F, Oses P, Derval N, Barandon L, Denis A, Hocini M, Roques X, Haïssaguerre M, Labrousse L, Jaïs P. Garcia R, et al. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014 Dec;41(3):245-51. doi: 10.1007/s10840-014-9949-0. Epub 2014 Nov 9. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014. PMID: 25381645 Clinical Trial.
  • 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, Chen PS, Chen SA, Chung MK, Cosedis Nielsen J, Curtis AB, Davies DW, Day JD, d'Avila A, Natasja de Groot NMS, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Ellinor PT, Ernst S, Fenelon G, Gerstenfeld EP, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Helm RH, Hylek E, Jackman WM, Jalife J, Kalman JM, Kautzner J, Kottkamp H, Kuck KH, Kumagai K, Lee R, Lewalter T, Lindsay BD, Macle L, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, Michaud GF, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Okumura K, Packer D, Pokushalov E, Reynolds MR, Sanders P, Scanavacca M, Schilling R, Tondo C, Tsao HM, Verma A, Wilber DJ, Yamane T; Document Reviewers:. Calkins H, et al. Europace. 2018 Jan 1;20(1):e1-e160. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux274. Europace. 2018. PMID: 29016840 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
  • Biatrial versus Isolated Left Atrial Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Li H, Lin X, Ma X, Tao J, Zou R, Yang S, Liu H, Hua P. Li H, et al. Biomed Res Int. 2018 Apr 29;2018:3651212. doi: 10.1155/2018/3651212. eCollection 2018. Biomed Res Int. 2018. PMID: 29854748 Free PMC article.