Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr 1;18(7):2524-36.
doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2010.02.039. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

Synthesis and pharmacological characterization of a new series of 5,7-disubstituted-[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a][1,3,5]triazine derivatives as adenosine receptor antagonists: A preliminary inspection of ligand-receptor recognition process

Affiliations

Synthesis and pharmacological characterization of a new series of 5,7-disubstituted-[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a][1,3,5]triazine derivatives as adenosine receptor antagonists: A preliminary inspection of ligand-receptor recognition process

Giorgia Pastorin et al. Bioorg Med Chem. .

Abstract

A new series of triazolotriazines variously substituted at the C5 and N7 (5-25) positions was synthesized and fully characterized at the four adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes. In particular, arylacetyl or arylcarbamoyl moieties were introduced at the N7 position, which enhanced affinity at the hA(2B) and hA(3) ARs, respectively, when utilized on the pyrazolo-triazolopyrimidine nucleus as we reported in the past. In general, compounds with a free amino group at the 7 position (5, 6), showed good affinity at the rat (r) A(2A) AR (range 18.3-96.5nM), while the introduction of a phenylcarbamoyl moiety at the N7 position (12, 19, 24) slightly increased the affinity at the hA(3) AR (range 311-633nM) with respect to the unsubstituted derivatives. The binding profiles of the synthesized analogues seemed to correlate with the substitutions at the C5 and N7 positions. At the hA(2B) AR, derivative 5, which contained a free amino group at the 7 position, was the most potent (EC(50) 3.42microM) and could represent a starting point for searching new non-xanthine hA(2B) AR antagonists. Molecular models of the rA(2A) and hA(3) ARs were constructed by homology to the recently reported crystallographic structure of the hA(2A) AR. A preliminary receptor-driven structure-activity relationship (SAR) based on the analysis of antagonist docking has been provided.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Multiple sequence alignment of hA2A receptor, rat A2A receptor and hA3 receptor. Conserved residues in all the sequences are identified by stars. Differences in sequences of rA2A and hA3 compared to hA2A are shown in boldface type.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structure superimposition of crystallographic pose (in magenta) and docking pose (in green) of ZM241385 inside the rA2A AR binding site. Side chains of some amino acids important for ligand recognition and H-bonding interactions are highlighted. Hydrogen atoms are not displayed.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Structure superimposition of docked conformations of compound 5 (in red, Ki rA2AAR = 18.3 ± 3.4) and compound 18 (in magenta, Ki rA2AAR = 38.9 ± 3.5) inside the rA2A AR binding pocket. Side chains of some amino acids important for ligand recognition and H-bonding interactions are highlighted. Hydrogen atoms are not displayed.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Electrostatic interaction energy (in kcal/mol) between the ligand and each single amino acid involved in ligand recognition calculated from: (A) crystallographic binding mode of ZM241385 inside the hA2A receptor (PDB code: 3EML); (B) hypothetical binding mode of ZM241385 inside the rA2A receptor obtained after docking simulations; (C) hypothetical binding mode of compound 5 inside the rA2A receptor obtained after docking simulations; and (D) hypothetical binding mode of compound 18 inside the rA2A receptor obtained after docking simulations.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Hydrophobic interaction energy (in arbitrary hydrophobic unit) between the ligand and each single amino acid involved in ligand recognition calculated from: (A) crystallographic binding mode of ZM241385 inside the hA2A receptor (PDB code: 3EML); (B) hypothetical binding mode of ZM241385 inside the rA2A receptor obtained after docking simulations; (C) hypothetical binding mode of compound 5 inside the rA2A receptor obtained after docking simulations; and (D) hypothetical binding mode of compound 18 inside the rA2A receptor obtained after docking simulations.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
Reagents: (i) EtOH, dimethylamine, 120 °C sealed tube, 4 h; (ii) R–N=C=O, dioxane, Et3N, reflux, 12 h; (iii) R–COCl, dioxane, reflux, 12 h.
Chart 1
Chart 1
Pyrazolo-triazolopyrimidine derivatives as A2A and A3 AR antagonists.
Chart 2
Chart 2
Triazolotriazine derivatives as AR antagonists.
Chart 3
Chart 3
Molecular simplification approach applied for the design of the novel triazolotriazine analogs.
Chart 4
Chart 4
Summary of the most relevant SAR features of the novel triazolotriazine analogs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Downey JM, Cohen MV, Ytrehus K, Liu Y. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1994;723:82. - PubMed
    1. Auchampach JA, Jin X, Wan TC, Caughey GH, Linden J. Mol Pharmacol. 1997;52:846. - PubMed
    1. Jacobson KA, von Lubitz DKJE, Daly JW, Fredholm BB. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1996;17:108. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fredholm BB. Int Rev Neurobiol. 1997;40:259. - PubMed
    1. Feoktistov I, Polosa R, Holgate ST, Biaggioni I. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1998;19:148. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources