Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jun 10;115(23):4657-63.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-11-253435. Epub 2010 Mar 19.

Clinical significance of low levels of minimal residual disease at the end of remission induction therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Clinical significance of low levels of minimal residual disease at the end of remission induction therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Patricia Stow et al. Blood. .

Abstract

Minimal residual disease (MRD) at the end of remission-induction therapy predicts relapse in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We examined the clinical significance of levels below the usual threshold value for MRD positivity (0.01%) in 455 children with B-lineage ALL, using polymerase chain reaction amplification of antigen-receptor genes capable of detecting at least 1 leukemic cell per 100 000 normal mononucleated cells (0.001%). Of the 455 clinical samples studied on day 46 of therapy, 139 (30.5%) had MRD 0.001% or more with 63 of these (45.3%) showing levels of 0.001% to less than 0.01%, whereas 316 (69.5%) had levels that were either less than 0.001% or undetectable. MRD measurements of 0.001% to less than 0.01% were not significantly related to presenting characteristics but were associated with a poorer leukemia cell clearance on day 19 of remission induction therapy. Patients with this low level of MRD had a 12.7% (+/- 5.1%; SE) cumulative risk of relapse at 5 years, compared with 5.0% (+/- 1.5%) for those with lower or undetectable MRD (P < .047). Thus, low levels of MRD (0.001%-< 0.01%) at the end of remission induction therapy have prognostic significance in childhood ALL, suggesting that patients with this finding should be monitored closely for adverse events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Day 19 MRD levels by flow cytometry in 3 patient cohorts defined according to day 46 MRD levels by PCR. The size of each cohort is given within the diagram. Horizontal bars represent median values. Levels of minimal residual disease (MRD) on day 19 were significantly different in the 3 groups (P < .001 by Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance test).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative incidence of relapse (mean ± SE) among 379 children with B-lineage ALL whose MRD levels were less than 0.01% on day 46 (end of remission induction therapy). Patients with MRD 0.001% to less than 0.01% had a significantly higher incidence of relapse than those with lower levels or undetectable MRD by PCR.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pui CH, Campana D, Pei D, et al. Treating childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia without cranial irradiation. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(26):2730–2741. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Möricke A, Reiter A, Zimmermann M, et al. Risk-adjusted therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia can decrease treatment burden and improve survival: treatment results of 2169 unselected pediatric and adolescent patients enrolled in the trial ALL-BFM 95. Blood. 2008;111(9):4477–4489. - PubMed
    1. Pui CH, Campana D, Evans WE. Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: current status and future perspectives. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2(10):597–607. - PubMed
    1. Campana D. Molecular determinants of treatment response in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2008;2008:366–373. - PubMed
    1. Cavé H, van der Werff ten Bosch J, Suciu S, et al. Clinical significance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer–Childhood Leukemia Cooperative Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(9):591–598. - PubMed

Publication types