Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Apr;13(4):458-66.
doi: 10.1038/nn.2515. Epub 2010 Mar 21.

Control of sexual differentiation and behavior by the doublesex gene in Drosophila melanogaster

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Control of sexual differentiation and behavior by the doublesex gene in Drosophila melanogaster

Elizabeth J Rideout et al. Nat Neurosci. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Doublesex proteins, which are part of the structurally and functionally conserved Dmrt gene family, are important for sex determination throughout the animal kingdom. We inserted Gal4 into the doublesex (dsx) locus of Drosophila melanogaster, allowing us to visualize and manipulate cells expressing dsx in various tissues. In the nervous system, we detected differences between the sexes in dsx-positive neuronal numbers, axonal projections and synaptic density. We found that dsx was required for the development of male-specific neurons that coexpressed fruitless (fru), a regulator of male sexual behavior. We propose that dsx and fru act together to form the neuronal framework necessary for male sexual behavior. We found that disrupting dsx neuronal function had profound effects on male sexual behavior. Furthermore, our results suggest that dsx-positive neurons are involved in pre- to post-copulatory female reproductive behaviors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Expression of GAL4 from the dsx locus recapitulates endogenous dsx expression. (a) Schematic of dsx (dsx+) and GAL4 knock-in allele (dsxGAL4). Transcriptional start sites, arrows; black boxes, exons. (b) Male and female dsxGAL4 locus predicted transcripts. (c,d) dsxGAL4, UAS-nlacZ 2-day-old male pupa. anti-Dsx (green), anti-ßGal (magenta). (c) Brain and (d) VNC. Ventral views; anterior up. Scale bars = 50 μm. (e-l) dsxGAL4 transformation of secondary sexual characteristics; dorsal abdominal cuticular pigmentation; external genitalia; T1 leg basitarsal detail. (e) XY and (f) XX wild-type. (g) XX dsx-null intersexual. (h) XX tra-null pseudo-male. (i) XY UAS-dsxF;dsxGAL4 pseudo-female. (j) XX dsxGAL4/UAS-dsxM pseudo-male. (k) XX UAS-traIR;dsxGAL4. (l) XX dsxGAL4/UAS-tra2IR.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sexually dimorphic expression of dsxGAL4-neurons and associated projections and colocalization with FruM in 3-5 day adult CNSs. (a) Male brain, dsx neuronal clusters (arrowheads), male-specific SN neurons (only one cell in plane of focus; arrow). The cell bodies of pC1 ,pC2, and pC3 in dorsal inferomedial, inferolateral, and superomedial protocerebral areas respectively. (b,c) Male brain, SN cells position, boxed. (d-f) Female brain; (d) dsx neuronal clusters (arrowheads). (g) Male VNC, Abg cluster (arrowhead), male-specific TN1 and TN2 neurons (arrow). (h) Female VNC, Abg cluster (arrowhead). (i,j) Male VNC. (k) Female VNC, hindleg contralateral projection (arrow). (l) Female VNC. (a,d,g,h) Neuronal cell bodies expressing UAS-pStingerII (nGFP). anti-GFP (green). (b,e,i,k) Neuronal projections expressing UAS-mCD8::GFP (membrane-bound GFP), anti-mCD8 (green). (c,f,j,l) Synaptic expression; expressing UAS-synaptotagmin (pre-synaptic marker) tagged with HA, anti-HA (green). Neuropil counterstained with anti-nC82 (magenta). Ventral views; anterior top. (m) UAS-RedStinger;dsxGAL4, UAS-mCD8::GFP male and (n) female brain. Dsx neuronal clusters (arrowheads). anti-RFP(magenta); anti-GFP (green). Horizontal view, ventral top. Scale bars = 50 μm.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sex apecific dsxGAL4 expression in the foreleg and effect of basitarsal amputations on axonal projections. (a-d) Sexually dimorphic expression in T1 foreleg. (a) Male T1 leg (medial aspect), sex comb (boxed). dsxGAL4 expressing cells in metatarsus = 96 ± 14.4 (n=7) and tarsi 2-5 = 72 ± 10.0 (n=7) (b) Medial and (c) lateral aspect male T1 tarsi and metatarsus, sex comb (boxed). (d) Female T1 tarsi and metatarsus (lateral aspect), area consistent with sex comb (boxed). dsxGAL4 expressing cells in metatarsus = 77 ± 12.4 (n=8) and tarsi 2-5 = 58 ± 9.7 (n=7) (e) Male T1 tarsi and metatarsus (medial aspect), elav-GAL80 repression in subset of dsxGAL4 cells, metatarsal sex comb (boxed). (f) Wild-type male and (h) wild-type female prothoracic axonal projections (close-up from Fig. 2k). (g) Atrophied male and (i) atrophied female prothoracic axonal projections, post-amputation. Point of amputation, arrowheads (a). Scale bar = 50 μm.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Co-localization of FruM neuronal cells and dsxGAL4 cells (expressing UAS-nGFP) in 3-day-old adult male. anti-nGFP (green), anti-FruM (magenta). (a) Brain; Dorsal view; anterior up. dsx and FruM neuronal cells and clusters designated. (b) VNC. Ventral view; anterior up. dsx and FruM neuronal cells and clusters that colocalize, designated. FruM clusters as previously described. Scale bars = 50 μm.
Figure 5
Figure 5
dsxGAL4 expression in CNSs of FruM-null males and females expressing FruM or the anti-apoptotic transgene UAS-p35. (a,b) Schematic of dsxGAL4 nGFP expression in wild-type adult male (a) and female (b) CNSs. Individual neuronal clusters designated. (c) nGFP and (d) Membrane-bound GFP in FruM-null adult male brain. (e) nGFP and (f) Membrane-bound GFP in FruM-null adult male VNC, reduction in prothoracic contralateral (boxed area) and cervical connection projections (arrowhead). (g) nGFP and (h) membrane-bound GFP in adult female brain expressing FruM. (i) nGFP and (j membrane-bound GFP in adult female VNC expressing FruM. (k) nGFP and (l) membrane-bound GFP in adult female brain expressing both DsxF and DsxM. Supernumerary SN cells (boxed area). (m) nGFP adult female VNC expressing both DsxF and DsxM. Supernumerary male-specific TN1 and TN2 cells (boxed area, arrow). (n) Membrane-bound GFP in adult female brain expressing both DsxF and DsxM. Prothoracic contralateral projections (boxed area). (o) UAS-p35;dsxGAL4 adult female brain, supernumerary SN cells (boxed area). (p) UAS-p35;dsxGAL4 adult female VNC, supernumerary TN1 (arrowheads) and TN2 (boxed area) neurons. (q-s) UAS-nLacZ,-mCD8::GFP,-p35;dsxGAL4 adult female prothoracic ganglion (Prg) (q) Merged image, co-expression of membrane-bound GFP, green (r) and nuclear ßGal, magenta (s). Supernumerary TN1 (arrowheads) and TN2 cells (boxed area) and ectopic contralateral projections. Ventral views; anterior up. (c, e, g, i, k, m) anti-GFP, green. (d, f, h, j, l, n, o, p) anti-mCD8, green and neuropil counter-stained with anti-nC82, magenta. Genotypes as per Methods. Scale bar = 50 μm
Figure 6
Figure 6
dsxGAL4 neurons control male sexual behavior. (a) Male fertility. p-values * <0.05, ** <0.0001 (Fisher Exact Test). (b) Courtship initiation. Mean ± SEM. p-values * <0.05 (Tukey-Kramer HSD statistical test). (c) Courtship index. Mean ± SEM. p-values * <0.05 (Tukey-Kramer HSD test). (d) Percentage males mating in 4-h. p-values ** <0.0001 (Fisher Exact Test). (e) Song-recording, 5-7 day old males. Pulse (P) and sine (S) song components indicated above traces, courtship display below. Each trace represents a fraction of a 10 min recording. Scale bar= 200 ms. Genotypes indicate males. Target females, wild-type. Wild-type males, (15); 18.6 ± 2.2 sine bouts per min (SBPM), 19.9 ± 1.4 pulse trains per min (PTPM), 8.1 ± 0.3 mean pulses per train (MPPT), 31.7 ± 3.0 interpulse interval (IPI, ms). UAS-TNTG; dsxGAL4 males, (10); no recordable data. UAS-TNTG; dsxGAL4, elav-GAL80 males, (10); 18.4 ± 1.5 (SBPM), 26.6 ± 3.8 (PTPM), 10.0 ± 0.4 (MPPT), 34.0 ± 0.4 (IPI, ms). Mean ± SEM. n’s in parentheses.
Figure 7
Figure 7
dsxGAL4 neurons control female sexual behavior. (a) Female fertility. p-values ** <0.0001 (Fisher Exact Test). (b) Egg-laying. Mean ± SEM. p-values * <0.0001 (Dunnett’s Test). (c) Percent copulation over time (10 minute intervals for 1 h). (d) Line crossings during copulation. Mean ± SEM. p-values * <0.05 (Tukey-Kramer HSD test). (e) Copulation duration. Mean ± SEM. p-values * <0.05 (Tukey-Kramer HSD test). (f) Percentage females re-mating with the same male in 4 h. p-values * <0.05 (Tukey-Kramer HSD test). Genotypes indicate females. Target males, wild-type. n’s in parentheses.

References

    1. Dickson BJ. Wired for sex: the neurobiology of Drosophila mating decisions. Science. 2008;322:904–909. - PubMed
    1. Villella A, Hall JC. Neurogenetics of courtship and mating in Drosophila. Adv Genet. 2008;62:67–184. - PubMed
    1. Zarkower D. Invertebrates may not be so different after all. Novartis Found Symp. 2002;244:115–126. discussion 126-135, 203-116, 253-117. - PubMed
    1. Williams TM, et al. The regulation and evolution of a genetic switch controlling sexually dimorphic traits in Drosophila. Cell. 2008;134:610–623. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ng CS, Kopp A. Sex combs are important for male mating success in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Genet. 2008;38:195–201. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources