Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs
- PMID: 20305857
Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the retentive force of six different attachment systems used for mandibular single-implant overdentures, including two prototype large ball attachment designs.
Materials and methods: Two prototype ball attachments of larger dimensions (7.9 and 5.9 mm) and four commercially available ball and stud attachments of standard dimensions (2.25 and 4.0 mm) were evaluated on three identical test casts resembling an edentulous mandible with severe residual ridge resorption. Five samples from each attachment system (n=30) were connected to three different implants (8.0-mm wide diameter, 3.75-mm regular diameter, and 4.0-mm regular diameter). An Instron testing machine with a computer software package was used to deliver a vertical dislodging force at a cross-head speed of 50 mm/min to each overdenture sample from the anterior direction. A total of 300 pull tests were conducted (50 per attachment system). The maximum load (retentive force) required to separate each overdenture from the supporting implant was then measured.
Results: The highest retentive force (36.97+/-2.23 N) was achieved with the 7.9-mm prototype ball attachment design, followed in a decreasing order by the 5.9-mm prototype ball attachment design (32.06+/-2.59 N), the standard 2.25-mm ball attachment (17.32+/-3.68 N), Locator white (12.39+/-0.55 N), Locator pink (9.40 N+/-0.74 N), and Locator blue (3.83+/-0.64 N). A statistically significant difference (P<.0001) was found between all attachments.
Conclusions: Attachment systems of larger dimensions provided higher retentive forces for mandibular single-implant overdentures. Further in vitro and in vivo research is necessary to determine prosthodontic outcomes with these attachments in edentulous patients prior to their routine clinical use internationally.
Similar articles
-
Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 Jul-Aug;17(4):526-35. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002. PMID: 12182295
-
Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.J Prosthodont. 2011 Jun;20(4):286-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00699.x. Epub 2011 May 3. J Prosthodont. 2011. PMID: 21539646
-
Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.J Prosthodont. 2004 Dec;13(4):221-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2004.04042.x. J Prosthodont. 2004. PMID: 15610542
-
Attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: a review of in vitro investigations on retention and wear features.Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Sep-Oct;22(5):429-40. Int J Prosthodont. 2009. PMID: 20095190 Review.
-
Mandibular single-implant overdentures: a review with surgical and prosthodontic perspectives of a novel approach.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Apr;20(4):356-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01666.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009. PMID: 19298290 Review.
Cited by
-
Single implant supported mandibular overdenture: A literature review.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):75-82. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.164881. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2016. PMID: 27134432 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Retention, Wear, and Maintenance of Attachment Systems for Single- or Two-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Systematic Review.Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 4;15(5):1933. doi: 10.3390/ma15051933. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35269164 Free PMC article. Review.
-
How the initial retentive force of implant-supported overdentures can be affected with splinted and unsplinted attachments systems.Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021 Dec 10;18:101. eCollection 2021. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2021. PMID: 35265284 Free PMC article.
-
Biomaterial aspects: A key factor in the longevity of implant overdenture attachment systems.J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015 Jul-Aug;5(4):255-62. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.161752. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015. PMID: 26312224 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of attachment type on load distribution to implant abutments and the residual ridge in mandibular implant-supported overdentures.J Dent Biomech. 2015 Mar 16;6:1758736015576009. doi: 10.1177/1758736015576009. eCollection 2015. J Dent Biomech. 2015. PMID: 25798201 Free PMC article.