Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Feb;24(1):151-9.
doi: 10.1007/s10278-010-9282-9.

Imaging informatics: challenges in multi-site imaging trials

Affiliations

Imaging informatics: challenges in multi-site imaging trials

Steve Langer et al. J Digit Imaging. 2011 Feb.

Abstract

Multi-site imaging research has several specialized needs that are substantially different from what is commonly available in clinical imaging systems. An attempt to address these concerns is being led by several institutes including the National Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute. With the exception of results reporting (which has an infrastructure for standard reports, albeit with several competing lexicons), medical imaging has been largely standardized by the efforts of DICOM, HL7, and IHE. What are not well developed in this area are the tools required for multi-site imaging collaboration and data mining. The goal of this paper is to identify existing clinical interoperability methods that can be used to harmonize the research and clinical worlds, and identify gaps where they exist. To do so, we will detail the approaches of a specific multi-site trial, point out the current deficiencies and workarounds developed in that trial, and finally point to work that seeks to address multi-site imaging challenges.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
The data flow required by the Lung Tissue Consortium Radiology Data Coordinating Center. The flows provide feedback loops to assure that scans acquired at participating sites are received, processed, and archived. A variety of protocols including Web, DICOM, and mail are used to carry all the required messages and data payloads.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Langer S. Radiology speech recognition: workflow, integration, and productivity issues. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2002;31(3):95–104. doi: 10.1067/cdr.2002.125401. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Langer SG, Stewart BK. Computer security: a primer. J Digit Imaging. 1999;12(3):114–131. doi: 10.1007/BF03168630. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown MS, Sumit SK, Pais RC, Lee YZ, McNitt-Gray MF, Goldin JG, Cardenas AF, Aberle DR. Database Design and Implementation for Quantitative Image Analysis Research. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine. 2005;9(1):99–108. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2004.837854. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blois MS, Shortliffe EH. The computer meets medicine: Emergence of a discipline. In: Shortliffe EH, Perreault LE, editors. Medical informatics: computer applications in health care. Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley; 1990. p. 20.
    1. Rubin DL. Creating and curating a terminology for radiology: ontology modeling and analysis. J Digit Imaging. 2008;21(4):355–362. doi: 10.1007/s10278-007-9073-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed