Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;19(5):677-85.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9634-4. Epub 2010 Mar 21.

The development of a clinical outcomes survey research application: Assessment Center

Affiliations

The development of a clinical outcomes survey research application: Assessment Center

Richard Gershon et al. Qual Life Res. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: The National Institutes of Health sponsored Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) aimed to create item banks and computerized adaptive tests (CATs) across multiple domains for individuals with a range of chronic diseases.

Purpose: Web-based software was created to enable a researcher to create study-specific Websites that could administer PROMIS CATs and other instruments to research participants or clinical samples. This paper outlines the process used to develop a user-friendly, free, Web-based resource (Assessment Center) for storage, retrieval, organization, sharing, and administration of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments.

Methods: Joint Application Design (JAD) sessions were conducted with representatives from numerous institutions in order to supply a general wish list of features. Use Cases were then written to ensure that end user expectations matched programmer specifications. Program development included daily programmer "scrum" sessions, weekly Usability Acceptability Testing (UAT) and continuous Quality Assurance (QA) activities pre- and post-release.

Results: Assessment Center includes features that promote instrument development including item histories, data management, and storage of statistical analysis results.

Conclusions: This case study of software development highlights the collection and incorporation of user input throughout the development process. Potential future applications of Assessment Center in clinical research are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Add an instrument
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Item statistics
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
PROMIS profile report

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zerhouni E. Medicine. The NIH roadmap. Science. 2003;302(5642):63–72. - PubMed
    1. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, et al. The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care. 2007;45(5 Suppl 1):S3–S11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeWalt DA, Rothrock N, Yount S, Stone AA. Evaluation of item candidates: The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care. 2007;45(5 Suppl 1):S12–S21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cella D, Riley W, Stone AA, Rothrock N, Reeve BB, Yount S, et al. Initial item banks and first wave testing of the patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) network: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2009 In Press. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cella D, Gershon R, Lai JS, Choi S. The future of outcomes measurement: Item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research. 2007;16(Suppl 1):133–141. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources