Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and surgical histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors
- PMID: 20306384
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1244006
Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and surgical histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors
Abstract
Study aim: To assess the accuracy of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal stroma cell tumors (GIST) from other submucosal tumors, using both cytology and histology.
Patients and methods: We conducted a prospective study from May 2005 to September 2008 in all patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Only patients in whom surgical resection was carried out were included in the final analysis. In cases of mesenchymal tumor, immunocytochemistry was attempted for further differentiation between GIST and non-GIST. Surgical histopathology served as the gold standard.
Results: A total of 47 patients were analyzable, with a final histologic diagnosis of 35 mesenchymal tumors. Sufficient tissue for conventional cytologic diagnosis was obtained only in the 35 patients with mesenchymal tumors; in this subgroup, immunocytochemistry was possible in 46 %. If and only if enough material was available for immunocytochemistry, the sensitivity for (correct recognition of) GIST tumors was 93 %. In all 12 patients with nonmesenchymal tumors and lesions, cytology was nondiagnostic and the diagnosis had to be based on clinical suspicion and the appearance on endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). On an intention-to-diagnose basis, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) had a positive predictive value for mesenchymal tumors of 100 %, but no value for the diagnosis of other lesions; using immunocytochemistry, a GIST tumor was recognized among the mesenchymal tumors with a sensitivity of 58 % and a specificity of 8 %.
Conclusions: EUS-FNA-based cytology is safe and has only limited value for the differential diagnosis of submucosal tumors, mainly because insufficient material is harvested. Better tissue acquisition techniques are necessary for better differential diagnosis.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart. New York.
Comment in
-
Keyhole biopsy: an easy and better alternative to fine-needle aspiration or Tru-cut biopsy of submucosal gastrointestinal tumors.Endoscopy. 2010 Aug;42(8):685; author reply 685. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244247. Epub 2010 Jul 28. Endoscopy. 2010. PMID: 20669081 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions: a prospective study of 50 cases.Diagn Cytopathol. 2011 Nov;39(11):808-17. doi: 10.1002/dc.21464. Epub 2010 Sep 10. Diagn Cytopathol. 2011. PMID: 20836005
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and trucut biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors: a randomized crossover study.Endoscopy. 2010 Apr;42(4):292-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244074. Epub 2010 Mar 30. Endoscopy. 2010. PMID: 20354939 Clinical Trial.
-
A limited immunocytochemical panel for the distinction of subepithelial gastrointestinal mesenchymal neoplasms sampled by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.Am J Clin Pathol. 2008 Feb;129(2):219-25. doi: 10.1309/NL2WYAD8EUH3XFRF. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008. PMID: 18208801
-
Submucosal tumors: comprehensive guide for the diagnosis and therapy of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors.Dig Endosc. 2013 Sep;25(5):479-89. doi: 10.1111/den.12149. Epub 2013 Jul 31. Dig Endosc. 2013. PMID: 23902569 Review.
-
A multidisciplinary approach to the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor.J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug;47(7):578-85. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182936c87. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 23751846 Review.
Cited by
-
Using Forceps Biopsy after Small Submucosal Dissection in the Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors.J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Nov;31(11):1768-1774. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.11.1768. J Korean Med Sci. 2016. PMID: 27709855 Free PMC article.
-
How to Approach Submucosal Lesions in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Different Ideas between China and USA.Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2022 Feb 24;2022:8635387. doi: 10.1155/2022/8635387. eCollection 2022. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2022. PMID: 35251164 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of diagnostic performances of slow-pull suction and standard suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for gastrointestinal subepithelial tumors.Clin Endosc. 2022 Sep;55(5):637-644. doi: 10.5946/ce.2021.257. Epub 2022 Aug 17. Clin Endosc. 2022. PMID: 35973440 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric fundus subepithelial tumors originating from the muscularis propria.Exp Ther Med. 2013 Aug;6(2):391-395. doi: 10.3892/etm.2013.1181. Epub 2013 Jun 25. Exp Ther Med. 2013. PMID: 24137195 Free PMC article.
-
Fine-needle biopsy is superior to fine-needle aspiration of suspected gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a large multicenter study.Endosc Int Open. 2019 Jul;7(7):E931-E936. doi: 10.1055/a-0953-1640. Epub 2019 Jul 11. Endosc Int Open. 2019. PMID: 31304239 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical