Premedication with oral midazolam with or without parental presence
- PMID: 20306569
- DOI: 10.1097/eja.0b013e328331a3bb
Premedication with oral midazolam with or without parental presence
Abstract
Background and objective: In this study, we aimed to investigate whether the combination of low-dose (0.25 mg kg(-1)) midazolam premedication with parental presence can effectively reduce anxiety at induction as well as provide a smoother emergence.
Methods: Institutional ethics committee approval and informed consent from one of the parents were obtained prior to the study. Sixty ASA grade I or II children undergoing surgery were enrolled in the study. Children were randomized to receive either 0.5 mg kg(-1) midazolam orally (group M) or 0.25 mg kg(-1) midazolam orally with parental presence (group MP) or parental presence alone (group P). The child's anxiety and sedation scores were evaluated as 1-4 points on the Anxiety Scale and as 0-4 points on the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS), respectively, at the entrance to the operating room and for tolerance to the face mask. Heart rate, the mean arterial blood pressure and O2 saturation (%) were assessed at repeated intervals before and after induction. At the end of surgery, the child's Anxiety Scale score, UMSS score, Observer's Pain Scale (OPS) score and FLACC score were also assessed.
Results: There were no differences between groups in demographic variables and duration of surgery or anaesthesia. Mean blood pressure changes were similar between groups at measured intervals, but the heart rate was higher in group M before and after induction of anaesthesia (P<0.05). UMSS score was greater in both midazolam groups (groups M and MP) in the preoperative period (P<0.05). Anxiety Scale scores for anxiolysis were higher in groups M and MP than in group P (less anxious and more sedated) at 20 min after premedication, at the entrance to the operating room and at mask tolerance time points (P<0.05). During recovery there was no significant difference in sedation, recovery scores or behavioural anxiety assessment between groups, Anxiety Scale score, UMSS score, FLACC score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and Observer's Pain Scale score in groups MP, M and P.
Conclusion: Preoperative administration of midazolam 0.5 mg kg(-1) for premedication alone, without parental presence at induction, and that of low-dose midazolam 0.25 mg kg(-1) for premedication with parental presence at induction are both equally effective in reducing separation anxiety and providing a smooth emergence. However, parental presence alone, without midazolam for premedication, is not an adequate approach for this outcome. If the environment for parental presence is convenient, the dose of midazolam may be reduced and induction and emergence conditions may still be of high quality.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of premedication agents administered prior to nitrous oxide/oxygen.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Apr;27(4):341-6. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283313cdd. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010. PMID: 20090541 Clinical Trial.
-
The effect of nasal midazolam premedication on parents-child separation and recovery time in dental procedures under general anaesthesia.Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015 Jun;16(2):135-8. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015. PMID: 26147820 Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam for premedication in pediatric anesthesia: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.Anesth Analg. 2008 Jun;106(6):1715-21. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816c8929. Anesth Analg. 2008. PMID: 18499600 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of melatonin vs. midazolam for oral premedication in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Minerva Pediatr (Torino). 2025 Feb;77(1):94-104. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5276.24.07519-0. Epub 2024 Dec 2. Minerva Pediatr (Torino). 2025. PMID: 39621359
-
Oral Dexmedetomidine Achieves Superior Effects in Mitigating Emergence Agitation and Demonstrates Comparable Sedative Effects to Oral Midazolam for Pediatric Premedication: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies.J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 19;13(4):1174. doi: 10.3390/jcm13041174. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38398486 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Oral Triclofos and Oral Midazolam as Premedication in Children undergoing Elective Surgery.Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;13(2):366-369. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_13_19. Anesth Essays Res. 2019. PMID: 31198261 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam for paediatric premedication.Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Feb;61(2):125-130. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.199850. Indian J Anaesth. 2017. PMID: 28250480 Free PMC article.
-
Emergence Delirium in Pediatric Anesthesia.Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Feb;19(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s40272-016-0201-5. Paediatr Drugs. 2017. PMID: 27798810 Review.
-
Is midazolam superior to triclofos and hydroxyzine as premedicant in children?J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jan;30(1):53-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.125704. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2014. PMID: 24574594 Free PMC article.
-
POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AND STRESS RESPONSE: DOES CHILD'S GENDER HAVE AN INFLUENCE?Acta Clin Croat. 2019 Jun;58(2):274-280. doi: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.02.10. Acta Clin Croat. 2019. PMID: 31819323 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources