Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Apr;38(4):367-74.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.008.

Promoting primary care smoking-cessation support with quitlines: the QuitLink Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Promoting primary care smoking-cessation support with quitlines: the QuitLink Randomized Controlled Trial

Stephen F Rothemich et al. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Counseling by clinicians promotes smoking cessation, but in most U.S. primary care practices, it is difficult to provide more than brief advice to quit in the course of routine work. Telephone quitlines can deliver effective intensive counseling, but few collaborate closely with clinicians.

Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether cessation support in practices is enhanced by a systems approach, in partnership with quitlines.

Design: A cluster RCT was used.

Setting/participants: Participants included 1817 adult smokers from 16 primary care practices in the Virginia Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network.

Intervention: An expanded tobacco-use "vital sign" intervention (identify smokers, advise cessation, and assess readiness to quit) that was combined with fax referral of preparation-stage smokers to a quitline providing feedback to practices was compared to a traditional tobacco-use vital sign alone.

Main outcome measures: The frequency of cessation support (in-office discussion of methods to quit or quitline referral) reported by patients in an exit survey (September 2005-July 2006, analyzed in 2008) was measured.

Results: The adjusted percentage of smokers who reported receiving cessation support differed by 12.5% in intervention and control practices (40.7% vs 28.2%, respectively; p<0.001). Both in-office discussion of methods to quit and quitline referral increased significantly with the intervention. Post hoc analysis revealed that the increase in cessation was stable for both patient gender and visit type and was more pronounced with patients aged 35-54 years and with male and more experienced clinicians.

Conclusions: A systems approach to identifying smokers, advising and assessing readiness to quit, combined with a partnership with a quitline, increases delivery of cessation support for primary care patients beyond that accomplished by traditional tobacco-use vital sign screening alone.

Clinical trial registration: NCT00112268.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Associated data