Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;34(3):291-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.02.010. Epub 2010 Mar 21.

Functional polymorphisms to modulate luminal lipid exposure and risk of colorectal cancer

Affiliations

Functional polymorphisms to modulate luminal lipid exposure and risk of colorectal cancer

Ikuko Kato et al. Cancer Epidemiol. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Fat absorption may play a crucial role in colorectal carcinogenesis by determining intra-colonic exposure to potentially carcinogenic lipid metabolites.

Methods: We conducted a population-based case-control study that included 1163 cases and 1501 controls to examine whether individuals who carry genetic variants associated with lower lipid absorption have a higher risk of colorectal cancer. Using Taqman assay, we determined FABP2 alanine (A)/threonine (T) polymorphism at codon 54 in exon-2 and APOE isoforms. Multivariable odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by unconditional logistic regression models, assuming FABP2 A54 and APO non-E4 as high risk alleles.

Results: We found no associations with either of the polymorphisms. The OR associated with FABP2 A54 homozygotes compared with the others was 1.01 (95% CI; 0.86-1.45) and that for non-ApoE4 carriers compared with carries was 0.95 (95% CI; 0.80-1.13). However, there was a statistically significant negative interaction between total fat intake and FABP2 AA genotypes (p=0.025), indicating that the risk of colorectal cancer associated with this polymorphism is higher in the subjects with lower fat intake.

Conclusions: These results suggest that these SNPs may not be useful in predicting colorectal cancer risk in populations with high fat intake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

We declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WCRF/AICR. Food, Nutrition, physical activity and the prevention of cancer: global perspective. Washington DC: AICR; 2007. Colon and rectum; pp. 280–8.
    1. Alexander DD, Cushing CA, Lowe KA, Sceurman B, Roberts MA. Meta-analysis of animal fat or animal protein intake and colorectal cancer. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:1402–19. - PubMed
    1. Beresford SA, Johnson KC, Ritenbaugh C, Lasser NL, Snetselaar LG, Black HR, et al. Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of colorectal cancer: the Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial. JAMA. 2006;295:643–54. - PubMed
    1. Reddy BS. Dietary fat, calories, and fiber in colon cancer. Prev Med. 1993;22:738–49. - PubMed
    1. Tang ZC, Shivapurkar N, Frost A, Alabaster O. The effect of dietary fat on the promotion of mammary and colon cancer in a dual-organ rat carcinogenesis model. Nutr Cancer. 1996;25:151–9. - PubMed

Publication types