Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr 27;365(1544):1153-67.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0317.

The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent

Affiliations

The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent

Laurence Loewe et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Population genetics is fundamental to our understanding of evolution, and mutations are essential raw materials for evolution. In this introduction to more detailed papers that follow, we aim to provide an oversight of the field. We review current knowledge on mutation rates and their harmful and beneficial effects on fitness and then consider theories that predict the fate of individual mutations or the consequences of mutation accumulation for quantitative traits. Many advances in the past built on models that treat the evolution of mutations at each DNA site independently, neglecting linkage of sites on chromosomes and interactions of effects between sites (epistasis). We review work that addresses these limitations, to predict how mutations interfere with each other. An understanding of the population genetics of mutations of individual loci and of traits affected by many loci helps in addressing many fundamental and applied questions: for example, how do organisms adapt to changing environments, how did sex evolve, which DNA sequences are medically important, why do we age, which genetic processes can generate new species or drive endangered species to extinction, and how should policy on levels of potentially harmful mutagens introduced into the environment by humans be determined?

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barrick J. E., Yu D. S., Yoon S. H., Jeong H., Oh T. K., Schneider D., Lenski R. E., Kim J. F.2009Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli. Nature 461, 1243–1247 (doi:10.1038/nature08480) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barton N. H.2010Mutation and the evolution of recombination. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 1281–1294 (doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0320) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beaumont M. A., Rannala B.2004The Bayesian revolution in genetics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 251–261 (doi:10.1038/nrg1318) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bergthorsson U., Andersson D. I., Roth J. R.2007Ohno's dilemma: evolution of new genes under continuous selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 17 004–17 009 (doi:10.1073/pnas.0707158104) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bulmer M.1991The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics 129, 897–908 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types