Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns
- PMID: 20308444
- DOI: 10.1148/radiol.09091437
Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns
Abstract
Purpose: To use time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, also called four-dimensional flow MR imaging, to evaluate systolic blood flow patterns in the ascending aorta that may predispose patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) to aneurysm.
Materials and methods: The HIPAA-compliant protocol received institutional review board approval, and informed consent was obtained. Four-dimensional flow MR imaging was used to assess blood flow in the thoracic aorta of 53 individuals: 20 patients with a BAV, 25 patients with a tricuspid aortic valve (TAV), and eight healthy volunteers. The Fisher exact test was used to evaluate the significance of flow pattern differences.
Results: Nested helical flow was seen at peak systole in the ascending aorta of 15 of 20 patients with a BAV but in none of the healthy volunteers or patients with a TAV. This flow pattern was seen both in patients with a BAV with a dilated ascending aorta (n = 6) and in those with a normal ascending aorta (n = 9), was seen in the absence of aortic stenosis (n = 5), and was associated with eccentric systolic flow jets in all cases. Fusion of right and left leaflets gave rise to right-handed helical flow and right-anterior flow jets (n = 11), whereas right and noncoronary fusion gave rise to left-handed helical flow with left-posterior flow jets (n = 4).
Conclusion: Four-dimensional flow MR imaging showed abnormal helical systolic flow in the ascending aorta of patients with a BAV, including those without aneurysm or aortic stenosis. Identification and characterization of eccentric flow jets in these patients may help identify those at risk for development of ascending aortic aneurysm.
RSNA, 2010
Comment in
-
Aortopathy in bicuspid aortic valve disease: is it really congenital?Radiology. 2010 Sep;256(3):1015-6; author reply 1016. doi: 10.1148/radiol.101046. Radiology. 2010. PMID: 20720087 No abstract available.
-
Helical-shaped streamlines do not represent helical flow.Radiology. 2010 Dec;257(3):895-6; author reply 896. doi: 10.1148/radiol.101298. Radiology. 2010. PMID: 21084422 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical