Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy
- PMID: 20308476
- DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2651
Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy
Abstract
Objective: The objective of our study was to determine the relationship between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and Gleason score of prostate cancer and percentage of tumor involvement on prostate core biopsy.
Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective study of 57 patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer who underwent endorectal MRI with DWI between July 2007 and March 2008. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on ADC maps at sites of visible tumor on DW images and ADC maps. A hierarchic mixed linear model was used to compare the ADC value of prostate cancer with the Gleason score and the percentage of tumor on core biopsy.
Results: Eighty-one sites of biopsy-proven prostate cancer were visible on DW images and ADC maps. The least-squares mean ADC for disease with a Gleason score of 6 was 0.860 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (standard error of the mean [SEM], 0.036); Gleason score of 7, 0.702 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (SEM, 0.030); Gleason score of 8, 0.672 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (SEM, 0.057); and Gleason score of 9, 0.686 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s (SEM, 0.067). Differences between the mean ADC values for a prostate tumor with a Gleason score of 6 and one with a Gleason score of 7 (p = 0.0096) and for a prostate tumor with a Gleason score of 6 and one with a Gleason score of 8 (p = 0.0460) were significant. Comparison between the ADC and percentage of tumor on core biopsy showed a mean ADC decrease of 0.006 (range, 0.004-0.008 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) for every 1% increase in tumor in the core biopsy specimen.
Conclusion: DWI may help differentiate between low-risk (Gleason score, 6) and intermediate-risk (Gleason score, 7) prostate cancer and between low-risk (Gleason score, 6) and high-risk (Gleason score > 7) prostate cancer. There is an inverse relationship between the ADC and the percentage of tumor involvement on prostate core biopsies.
Comment in
-
Imaging.J Urol. 2010 Nov;184(5):1985-7. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.07.026. Epub 2010 Sep 19. J Urol. 2010. PMID: 22519998 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Prostate cancer: comparison of tumor visibility on trace diffusion-weighted images and the apparent diffusion coefficient map.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Jan;196(1):123-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4738. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011. PMID: 21178056
-
Initial experience with identifying high-grade prostate cancer using diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in patients with a Gleason score ≤ 3 + 3 = 6 upon schematic TRUS-guided biopsy: a radical prostatectomy correlated series.Invest Radiol. 2012 Mar;47(3):153-8. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31823ea1f0. Invest Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22293513
-
[Utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in detection of prostate cancer and prediction of pathologic Gleason score].Hinyokika Kiyo. 2012 Aug;58(8):405-8. Hinyokika Kiyo. 2012. PMID: 23052263 Japanese.
-
Diffusion-weighted MRI and its role in prostate cancer.NMR Biomed. 2014 Jan;27(1):25-38. doi: 10.1002/nbm.2956. Epub 2013 May 27. NMR Biomed. 2014. PMID: 23712781 Review.
-
Correlations between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Gleason Score in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Aug;3(4):489-497. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.12.006. Epub 2019 Jan 23. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31412009
Cited by
-
Multimodality imaging to predict response to systemic treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.PLoS One. 2015 Apr 1;10(4):e0120823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120823. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25831053 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation of diffusion tensor imaging parameters and Gleason scores of prostate cancer.Exp Ther Med. 2018 Jan;15(1):351-356. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.5363. Epub 2017 Oct 24. Exp Ther Med. 2018. PMID: 29250155 Free PMC article.
-
Information of prostate biopsy positive core: does it affect MR detection of prostate cancer on using 3T-MRI?Jpn J Radiol. 2015 May;33(5):246-52. doi: 10.1007/s11604-015-0407-4. Epub 2015 Mar 12. Jpn J Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25761402
-
Comparison of intensity normalization methods in prostate, brain, and breast cancer multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging.Front Oncol. 2025 Feb 7;15:1433444. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1433444. eCollection 2025. Front Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39990680 Free PMC article.
-
Prostate MRI: diffusion-weighted imaging at 1.5T correlates better with prostatectomy Gleason Grades than TRUS-guided biopsies in peripheral zone tumours.Eur Radiol. 2012 Feb;22(2):468-75. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2269-1. Epub 2011 Sep 14. Eur Radiol. 2012. PMID: 21913058
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical