A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis
- PMID: 20308517
- DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2772
A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of a new grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Materials and methods: Four grades were developed for lumbar foraminal stenosis on the basis of sagittal MRI. Grade 0 refers to the absence of foraminal stenosis; grade 1 refers to mild foraminal stenosis showing perineural fat obliteration in the two opposing directions, vertical or transverse; grade 2 refers to moderate foraminal stenosis showing perineural fat obliteration in the four directions without morphologic change, both vertical and transverse directions; and grade 3 refers to severe foraminal stenosis showing nerve root collapse or morphologic change. A total of 576 foramina in 96 patients were analyzed (from L3-L4 to L5-S1). Two experienced radiologists independently assessed the sagittal MR images. Interobserver agreement between the two radiologists and intraobserver agreement by one reader were analyzed using kappa statistics.
Results: According to reader 1, grade 1 foraminal stenosis was found in 33 foramina, grade 2 in six, and grade 3 in seven. According to reader 2, grade 1 foraminal stenosis was found in 32 foramina, grade 2 in six, and grade 3 in eight. Interobserver agreement in the grading of foraminal stenosis between the two readers was found to be nearly perfect (kappa value: right L3-L4, 1.0; left L3-L4, 0.905; right L4-L5, 0.929; left L4-L5, 0.942; right L5-S1, 0.919; and left L5-S1, 0.909). In intraobserver agreement by reader 1, grade 1 foraminal stenosis was found in 34 foramina, grade 2 in eight, and grade 3 in seven. Intraobserver agreement in the grading of foraminal stenosis was also found to be nearly perfect (kappa value: right L3-L4, 0.883; left L3-L4, 1.00; right L4-L5, 0.957; left L4-L5, 0.885; right L5-S1, 0.800; and left L5-S1, 0.905).
Conclusion: The new grading system for foraminal stenosis of the lumbar spine showed nearly perfect interobserver and intraobserver agreement and would be helpful for clinical study and routine practice.
Similar articles
-
A case of symptomatic extra-foraminal lumbosacral stenosis ("far-out syndrome") diagnosed by diffusion tensor imaging.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jun 15;37(14):E854-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318249537f. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012. PMID: 22246537
-
The clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for grading cervical neural foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Aug;203(2):412-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11647. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014. PMID: 25055278
-
A practical MRI grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.Br J Radiol. 2013 May;86(1025):20120515. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20120515. Epub 2013 Feb 14. Br J Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23410800 Free PMC article.
-
Unilateral calf hypertrophy seen in lumbosacral stenosis: case report and review of the literature.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Sep 15;27(18):E406-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200209150-00022. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002. PMID: 12634577 Review.
-
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grading Systems for Central Canal and Neural Foraminal Stenoses of the Lumbar and Cervical Spines With a Focus on the Lee Grading System.Korean J Radiol. 2023 Mar;24(3):224-234. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0351. Epub 2022 May 29. Korean J Radiol. 2023. PMID: 36788771 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Access Pain During Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Foraminal or Extraforaminal Disc Herniation.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 21;14(20):2337. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14202337. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39451660 Free PMC article.
-
Improvement of sleep quality after treatment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective comparative study between conservative versus surgical treatment.Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 24;10(1):14135. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71145-0. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32839532 Free PMC article.
-
Lumbar facet joint injection: feasibility as an alternative method in high-risk patients.Eur Radiol. 2013 Nov;23(11):3153-60. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2921-z. Epub 2013 Jun 12. Eur Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23756957
-
Significance of Coronal Proset Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Hidden Zone of the Mid-Zone Stenosis in the Lumbar Spine and Morphometric Analysis of the Mid-Zone Stenosis.Asian Spine J. 2016 Aug;10(4):646-54. doi: 10.4184/asj.2016.10.4.646. Epub 2016 Aug 16. Asian Spine J. 2016. PMID: 27559443 Free PMC article.
-
The Novel Technique of Uniportal Endoscopic Interlaminar Contralateral Approach for Coexisting L5-S1 Lateral Recess, Foraminal, and Extraforaminal Stenosis and Its Clinical Outcomes.J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 26;10(7):1364. doi: 10.3390/jcm10071364. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 33810404 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical