Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2010 May 5;102(9):650-62.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq057. Epub 2010 Mar 22.

Association between a germline OCA2 polymorphism at chromosome 15q13.1 and estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer survival

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Association between a germline OCA2 polymorphism at chromosome 15q13.1 and estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer survival

Elizabeth M Azzato et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

Background: Traditional prognostic factors for survival and treatment response of patients with breast cancer do not fully account for observed survival variation. We used available genotype data from a previously conducted two-stage, breast cancer susceptibility genome-wide association study (ie, Studies of Epidemiology and Risk factors in Cancer Heredity [SEARCH]) to investigate associations between variation in germline DNA and overall survival.

Methods: We evaluated possible associations between overall survival after a breast cancer diagnosis and 10 621 germline single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from up to 3761 patients with invasive breast cancer (including 647 deaths and 26 978 person-years at risk) that were genotyped previously in the SEARCH study with high-density oligonucleotide microarrays (ie, hypothesis-generating set). Associations with all-cause mortality were assessed for each SNP by use of Cox regression analysis, generating a per rare allele hazard ratio (HR). To validate putative associations, we used patient genotype information that had been obtained with 5' nuclease assay or mass spectrometry and overall survival information for up to 14 096 patients with invasive breast cancer (including 2303 deaths and 70 019 person-years at risk) from 15 international case-control studies (ie, validation set). Fixed-effects meta-analysis was used to generate an overall effect estimate in the validation dataset and in combined SEARCH and validation datasets. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: In the hypothesis-generating dataset, SNP rs4778137 (C>G) of the OCA2 gene at 15q13.1 was statistically significantly associated with overall survival among patients with estrogen receptor-negative tumors, with the rare G allele being associated with increased overall survival (HR of death per rare allele carried = 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.41 to 0.75, P = 9.2 x 10(-5)). This association was also observed in the validation dataset (HR of death per rare allele carried = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.78 to 0.99, P = .03) and in the combined dataset (HR of death per rare allele carried = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.73 to 0.92, P = 5 x 10(-4)).

Conclusion: The rare G allele of the OCA2 polymorphism, rs4778137, may be associated with improved overall survival among patients with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Quantile–quantile plot for the test statistics for the 10 621 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) evaluated in the Studies of Epidemiology and Risk factors in Cancer Heredity (SEARCH) dataset. The test statistic was the χ2 statistic from two-sided χ2 trend tests with 1 df. Solid circles represent the expected and observed test statistics for each SNP. Under the null hypothesis of no association at any locus, the points would be expected to follow the straight line. SNPs rs6626269 and rs4778137 are represented by a solid diamond and a solid square, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Associations between single-nucleotide polymorphism rs6626269 or rs4778137 and overall survival. Per-allele hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented. A) Nonstratified analyses for rs6626269 and rs4778137. B) Analyses for rs4778137 stratified by estrogen receptor (ER) status (ER positive [ER+] and ER negative [ER−]). Data are shown for analyses with the hypothesis-generating set (Studies of Epidemiology and Risk factors in Cancer Heredity [SEARCH]), individual studies in the validation dataset, the entire validation set, and a combined dataset (overall) containing data from the hypothesis-generating set and the validation set. Supplementary Table 1 (available online) presents descriptions of all studies. Squares = study-specific hazard ratios; area of the each square = inverse of the variance of the estimate; horizontal lines = 95% CIs; diamonds = summary hazard ratio estimates encompassing 95% CIs; dotted vertical line = combined summary hazard ratio. Hazard ratio statistical significance assessed by a trend test with 1 df. Study heterogeneity was assessed by use of the I2 statistic. All statistical tests were two-sided. BBCC = Bavarian Breast Cancer Cases and Controls; CGPS = Copenhagen Breast Cancer Study and Copenhagen General Population Study; CNIO-BCS = Spanish National Cancer Centre Breast Cancer Study; GESBC = Genetic Epidemiology Study of Breast Cancer by Age 50; HEBCS = Helsinki Breast Cancer Study; KARBAC = Karolinska Breast Cancer Study; KBCP = Kuopio Breast Cancer Project; kConFab/AOCS = The Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer/Australian Ovarian Cancer Study; MCBCS = Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer Study; MCCS = Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study; ORIGO = Leiden University Medical Centre Breast Cancer Study; PBCS = Polish Breast Cancer Study; SASBAC = Singapore and Swedish Breast Cancer Study; SBCS = Sheffield Breast Cancer Study; UCIBCS = University of California Irvine Breast Cancer Study.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cumulative overall survival among patients with estrogen receptor (ER)–negative breast cancer by genotype of the single-nucleotide polymorphism rs4778137. A Kaplan–Meier analysis was used. Total patients at risk in the analysis and number of patients at risk and overall survival rates with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for years 5, 10, and 15 after breast cancer diagnosis are presented. A) Cumulative survival for patients in the hypothesis-generating dataset from the Studies of Epidemiology and Risk factors in Cancer Heredity (SEARCH) study. B) Cumulative survival for patients in the validation set. C) Cumulative survival for patients in the combined hypothesis-generating and validation datasets. D) Predicted cumulative survival adjusted for study site for patients in the combined hypothesis-generating and validation datasets, adjusted to the baseline hazard function of the SEARCH study. All four analyses were stratified by rs4778137 genotype (C = common; G = rare). ** = patient numbers were too few to estimate a survival rate at this time point.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Common germline polymorphisms associated with breast cancer-specific survival.
    Pirie A, Guo Q, Kraft P, Canisius S, Eccles DM, Rahman N, Nevanlinna H, Chen C, Khan S, Tyrer J, Bolla MK, Wang Q, Dennis J, Michailidou K, Lush M, Dunning AM, Shah M, Czene K, Darabi H, Eriksson M, Lambrechts D, Weltens C, Leunen K, van Ongeval C, Nordestgaard BG, Nielsen SF, Flyger H, Rudolph A, Seibold P, Flesch-Janys D, Blomqvist C, Aittomäki K, Fagerholm R, Muranen TA, Olsen JE, Hallberg E, Vachon C, Knight JA, Glendon G, Mulligan AM, Broeks A, Cornelissen S, Haiman CA, Henderson BE, Schumacher F, Le Marchand L, Hopper JL, Tsimiklis H, Apicella C, Southey MC, Cross SS, Reed MW, Giles GG, Milne RL, McLean C, Winqvist R, Pylkäs K, Jukkola-Vuorinen A, Grip M, Hooning MJ, Hollestelle A, Martens JW, van den Ouweland AM, Marme F, Schneeweiss A, Yang R, Burwinkel B, Figueroa J, Chanock SJ, Lissowska J, Sawyer EJ, Tomlinson I, Kerin MJ, Miller N, Brenner H, Butterbach K, Holleczek B, Kataja V, Kosma VM, Hartikainen JM, Li J, Brand JS, Humphreys K, Devilee P, Tollenaar RA, Seynaeve C, Radice P, Peterlongo P, Manoukian S, Ficarazzi F, Beckmann MW, Hein A, Ekici AB, Balleine R, Phillips KA; kConFab Investigators; Benitez J, Zamora MP, Perez JI, Menéndez P, Jakubowska A, Lubinski J, Gron… See abstract for full author list ➔ Pirie A, et al. Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Apr 22;17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0570-7. Breast Cancer Res. 2015. PMID: 25897948 Free PMC article.
  • Genome-wide association study of survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
    Wu C, Kraft P, Stolzenberg-Solomon R, Steplowski E, Brotzman M, Xu M, Mudgal P, Amundadottir L, Arslan AA, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Gross M, Helzlsouer K, Jacobs EJ, Kooperberg C, Petersen GM, Zheng W, Albanes D, Boutron-Ruault MC, Buring JE, Canzian F, Cao G, Duell EJ, Elena JW, Gaziano JM, Giovannucci EL, Hallmans G, Hutchinson A, Hunter DJ, Jenab M, Jiang G, Khaw KT, LaCroix A, Li Z, Mendelsohn JB, Panico S, Patel AV, Qian ZR, Riboli E, Sesso H, Shen H, Shu XO, Tjonneland A, Tobias GS, Trichopoulos D, Virtamo J, Visvanathan K, Wactawski-Wende J, Wang C, Yu K, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Chanock S, Hoover R, Hartge P, Fuchs CS, Lin D, Wolpin BM. Wu C, et al. Gut. 2014 Jan;63(1):152-60. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303477. Epub 2012 Nov 24. Gut. 2014. PMID: 23180869 Free PMC article.
  • Germline copy number variations are associated with breast cancer risk and prognosis.
    Kumaran M, Cass CE, Graham K, Mackey JR, Hubaux R, Lam W, Yasui Y, Damaraju S. Kumaran M, et al. Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 7;7(1):14621. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14799-7. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 29116104 Free PMC article.
  • Genome-wide association study identifies common variants in SLC39A6 associated with length of survival in esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma.
    Wu C, Li D, Jia W, Hu Z, Zhou Y, Yu D, Tong T, Wang M, Lin D, Qiao Y, Zhou Y, Chang J, Zhai K, Wang M, Wei L, Tan W, Shen H, Zeng Y, Lin D. Wu C, et al. Nat Genet. 2013 Jun;45(6):632-8. doi: 10.1038/ng.2638. Epub 2013 May 5. Nat Genet. 2013. PMID: 23644492
  • Key molecules associated with thyroid carcinoma prognosis: A study based on transcriptome sequencing and GEO datasets.
    Bai M, Ke S, Yu H, Xu Y, Yu Y, Lu S, Wang C, Huang J, Ma Y, Dai W, Wu Y. Bai M, et al. Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 17;13:964891. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.964891. eCollection 2022. Front Immunol. 2022. PMID: 36059514 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(2):74–108. - PubMed
    1. Fitzgibbons PL, Page DL, Weaver D, et al. Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000;124(7):966–978. - PubMed
    1. Udler M, Pharoah PD. Germline genetic variation and breast cancer survival: prognostic and therapeutic implications. Future Oncol. 2007;3(5):491–495. - PubMed
    1. Zubor P, Dokus K, Kajo K, Danko J. Integration of polymorphic data into the clinical management of breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(12):1121–1122. - PubMed
    1. Lifsted T, Le Voyer T, Williams M, et al. Identification of inbred mouse strains harboring genetic modifiers of mammary tumor age of onset and metastatic progression. Int J Cancer. 1998;77(4):640–644. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms