The natural history of the normal first stage of labor
- PMID: 20308828
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d55925
The natural history of the normal first stage of labor
Erratum in
- Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;116(1):196
Abstract
Objective: To examine labor patterns in a large population and to explore an alternative approach for diagnosing abnormal labor progression.
Methods: Data from the National Collaborative Perinatal Project were used. A total of 26,838 parturients were selected who had a singleton term gestation, spontaneous onset of labor, vertex presentation, and a normal perinatal outcome. A repeated-measures analysis was used to construct average labor curves by parity. An interval-censored regression was used to estimate duration of labor stratified by cervical dilation at admission and centimeter by centimeter.
Results: The median time needed to progress from one centimeter to the next became shorter as labor advanced (eg, from 1.2 hours at 3-4 cm to 0.4 hours at 7-8 cm in nulliparas). Nulliparous women had the longest and most gradual labor curve; multiparous women of different parities had very similar curves. Nulliparas may start the active phase after 5 cm of cervical dilation and may not necessarily have a clear active phase characterized by precipitous dilation. The deceleration phase in the late active phase of labor may be an artifact in many cases.
Conclusion: The active phase of labor may not start until 5 cm of cervical dilation in multiparas and even later in nulliparas. A 2-hour threshold for diagnosing labor arrest may be too short before 6 cm of dilation, whereas a 4-hour limit may be too long after 6 cm. Given that cervical dilation accelerates as labor advances, a graduated approach based on levels of cervical dilation to diagnose labor protraction and arrest is proposed.
Level of evidence: III.
Comment in
-
The natural history of the normal first stage of labor.Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;116(1):193. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e5b086. Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20567189 No abstract available.
-
The natural history of the normal first stage of labor.Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;116(3):772. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ee9fdf. Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20733466 No abstract available.
-
Zhang's guideline to assess labour progression.Lancet. 2019 Jan 26;393(10169):300-301. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32274-8. Epub 2018 Dec 20. Lancet. 2019. PMID: 30581040 No abstract available.
References
-
- Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007;21:98–113.
-
- Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A, et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 2006;367:1819–29.
-
- Coleman VH, Lawrence H, Schulkin J. Rising cesarean delivery rates: the impact of cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2009;64:115–9.
-
- Niswander KR, Gordon M, editors. The collaborative perinatal study of the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke: the women and their pregnancies. Philadelphia (PA): WB Saunders; 1972.
-
- Friedman EA, Neff RK. Labor and delivery: impact on offspring. Littleton (MA): PSG Publishing Co., Inc.; 1987. p. 9–34.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials