Similar articles

• Cycle control with a 21-day compared with a 24-day oral contraceptive pill: a randomized controlled trial.

  Lynen RF. Lynen RF. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;115(4):867. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d70303. Obstet Gynecol. 2010. PMID: 20308855 No abstract available.
• Comparative profiles of reliability, cycle control and side effects of two oral contraceptive formulations containing 150 micrograms desogestrel and either 30 micrograms or 20 micrograms ethinyl oestradiol.

  Akerlund M, Røde A, Westergaard J. Akerlund M, et al. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Sep;100(9):832-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb14309.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993. PMID: 8218004 Clinical Trial.
• Randomized comparison of bleeding patterns in women using a combined contraceptive vaginal ring or a low-dose combined oral contraceptive on a menstrually signaled regimen.

  Weisberg E, Merki-Feld GS, McGeechan K, Fraser IS. Weisberg E, et al. Contraception. 2015 Feb;91(2):121-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Oct 22. Contraception. 2015. PMID: 25459098 Clinical Trial.
• [Individualization of low-dose oral contraceptives. Pharmacological principles and practical indications for oral contraceptives].

  Cianci A, De Leo V. Cianci A, et al. Minerva Ginecol. 2007 Aug;59(4):415-25. Minerva Ginecol. 2007. PMID: 17923832 Review. Italian.
• Cyclic vs. continuous or extended-cycle combined contraceptives.

  Kripke C. Kripke C. Am Fam Physician. 2006 Mar 1;73(5):804. Am Fam Physician. 2006. PMID: 16529087 Review. No abstract available.