Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct 26;118(3):195-201.
doi: 10.1042/cs20090183.

Reliability of heart rate variability measurements in patients with a history of myocardial infarction

Affiliations

Reliability of heart rate variability measurements in patients with a history of myocardial infarction

Roberto Maestri et al. Clin Sci (Lond). .

Abstract

Despite a well-established prognostic value in cardiac patients, HRV (heart rate variability) indexes have been used little in the clinical setting. Poor reliability of the measurements might be a possible explanation for this. In the present study, we assessed the reliability of short-term HRV indexes in post-MI (myocardial infarction) patients. We studied 61 MI patients [50 males; age, 59+/-8 years; and LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction), 46+/-6%; values are means +/-S.D.],who underwent a 5+5 min ECG recording during spontaneous and paced breathing on two consecutive days. Standard time-domain [SDNN (S.D. of RR interval values) and RMSSD (root- mean-square of successive RR interval differences)] and frequency-domain [LF (low-frequency) and HF (high-frequency) power, and LF/HF] indexes of HRV were computed. Absolute and relative reliability were assessed by the 95% limits of random variation and by the ICC (intra-class correlation coefficient). The agreement between the two measurements in classifying patients at low or high risk, according to different cut-points, and the sample size needed to detect a clinically relevant change, were also assessed. During spontaneous breathing, individual changes in test-retest measurements ranged from -41 to + 61% (SDNN; best case) and from -76 to + 316% (LF/HF; worst case). The ICC ranged from 0.72 to 0.81. Most patients (79-90 %) were assigned to the same class by the two measurements. Paced breathing did not improve reliability. In conclusion, short-term HRV parameters in MI patients may have large day-to-day variations, making the detection of treatment effects in individual patients difficult; however, the ICC values and the analysis of the consistency of classification between repeated tests indicate that HRV measurements fulfill the criteria required to be used for diagnostic or classification purposes.

PubMed Disclaimer