Bringing social structure back into clinical decision making
- PMID: 2031202
- DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90241-4
Bringing social structure back into clinical decision making
Abstract
Although research in the past twenty years has resulted in an increasingly sophisticated understanding of clinical decision making processes, the dominant approach in this area of inquiry remains limited. Most studies emphasize normative models of how decisions ought to be made, others attempt to describe physicians' thinking, but few take the social context of decision making systematically into account. Research models typically assume that physicians are autonomous professionals practicing in socially insular clinical settings--an approach that is consistent with classic formulations of the social structure of medical practice, but they ignore 30 years of sociological research on research on patient-physician relationships and major historical changes in the structure of medical practice. Eisenberg's still timely advice to students of clinical decision making--that they need to describe decision making in the context of 'sociologic influences' (including patient, physician and practice setting characteristics)--is expanded in the present discussion. Recent studies are reviewed, highlighting important dimensions of social structure impinging on physicians' decision making. Findings indicate that the process of clinical decision making is likely influenced by patients' age, gender, socioeconomic status, and race, physicians' professional training and experience, as well as by larger structural features of organized clinical settings. Our review of these studies on the social context of clinical decision making, however, reveals major methodological limitations including those inherently imposed by secondary data analysis, normative approaches, written case vignettes, small, non-random samples and the inadequate control of confounding influences. We present a feasible, alternative research strategy, built on a factorial experimental design. Illustrative findings indicate how complex social structural influence on clinical decision making may be disentangled in an unconfounded manner.
Similar articles
-
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305. Encephale. 2003. PMID: 14615699 French.
-
Sociologic influences on decision-making by clinicians.Ann Intern Med. 1979 Jun;90(6):957-64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-90-6-957. Ann Intern Med. 1979. PMID: 443692
-
Does it matter whether physicians' recommendations are given early or late in the decision-making process? An experimental study among patients with schizophrenia.BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 16;6(9):e011282. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011282. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27638491 Free PMC article.
-
Four models of the physician-patient relationship.JAMA. 1992 Apr 22-29;267(16):2221-6. JAMA. 1992. PMID: 1556799 Review. No abstract available.
-
Medical practice and social authority.J Med Philos. 1996 Aug;21(4):417-37. doi: 10.1093/jmp/21.4.417. J Med Philos. 1996. PMID: 8899540 Review.
Cited by
-
Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: historical and religious perspective in the Middle East.Int Psychiatry. 2013 Feb 1;10(1):20-21. eCollection 2013 Feb. Int Psychiatry. 2013. PMID: 31507719 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of health information technology on disparity of process of care.Int J Equity Health. 2015 Apr 1;14:34. doi: 10.1186/s12939-015-0161-3. Int J Equity Health. 2015. PMID: 25889891 Free PMC article.
-
Pain judgements of patients' relatives: examining the use of social contract theory as theoretical framework.J Behav Med. 2008 Aug;31(4):309-17. doi: 10.1007/s10865-008-9157-4. Epub 2008 May 16. J Behav Med. 2008. PMID: 18483846
-
Patients' Non-Medical Characteristics Contribute to Collective Medical Decision-Making at Multidisciplinary Oncological Team Meetings.PLoS One. 2016 May 11;11(5):e0154969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154969. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27167521 Free PMC article.
-
Dentists' management of the diabetic patient: contrasting generalists and specialists.Am J Public Health. 2007 Apr;97(4):725-30. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.086496. Epub 2007 Feb 28. Am J Public Health. 2007. PMID: 17329651 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous