Editorial
doi: 10.3109/02813431003625410.
Informed participation in cancer screening: the facts are changing, and GPs are going to feel it
- PMID: 20331385
- PMCID: PMC3440607
- DOI: 10.3109/02813431003625410
Item in Clipboard
Editorial
Informed participation in cancer screening: the facts are changing, and GPs are going to feel it
Scand J Prim Health Care.
2010 Mar.
No abstract available
Similar articles
-
Informed consent? How do primary care professionals prepare women for cervical smears: a qualitative study.Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Jun;61(3):381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.04.017. Epub 2005 Jun 17. Patient Educ Couns. 2006. PMID: 15964735
-
Views of Irish general practitioners on screening for cervical cancer.Ir J Med Sci. 2001 Jul-Sep;170(3):186-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03173887. Ir J Med Sci. 2001. PMID: 12120972
-
Physician colorectal cancer screening recommendations: an examination based on informed decision making.Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Apr;66(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.10.003. Epub 2006 Nov 13. Patient Educ Couns. 2007. PMID: 17098393 Free PMC article.
-
[Compliance, conscious participation, and informed consent in tumor screening programs].Epidemiol Prev. 1999 Oct-Dec;23(4):387-91. Epidemiol Prev. 1999. PMID: 10730482 Review. Italian.
-
Promoting informed decision making about prostate cancer screening.Compr Ther. 2001 Fall;27(3):195-201. doi: 10.1007/s12019-001-0014-4. Compr Ther. 2001. PMID: 11569319 Review.
Cited by
-
Milestones in the development of Nordic general practice*.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013 Mar;31(1):3-5. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2012.762163. Epub 2013 Jan 22. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013. PMID: 23336114 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of influences in a medical screening programme invitation: a randomized controlled trial.Eur J Public Health. 2023 Jun 1;33(3):509-514. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad067. Eur J Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37130347 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Marginal public health gain of screening for colorectal cancer: modelling study, based on WHO and national databases in the Nordic countries.J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Apr;19(2):400-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01845.x. Epub 2012 Apr 22. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013. PMID: 22519671 Free PMC article.
-
Psychosocial consequences of receiving false-positive colorectal cancer screening results: a qualitative study.Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019 Jun;37(2):145-154. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2019.1608040. Epub 2019 May 11. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019. PMID: 31079520 Free PMC article.
-
Early detection of prostate cancer: is screening in general practice justifiable?Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011 Sep;29(3):133-4. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2011.602555. Epub 2011 Aug 16. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011. PMID: 21846212 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Esserman L, Shieh Y, Thompson I. Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer. JAMA . 2009;302:1685–92. - PubMed
-
- Reventlow S, Sångren H, Brodersen J, Christensen B, Grauengaard A, Jarbøl D, et al. Addressing the future role of general practice at the 16th Nordic Congress in Copenhagen 2009: How can we ensure sustainable care in a complex world of evidence, context, organization, and personal care? Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26:193–5. - PMC - PubMed
-
- The trouble with screening. Lancet. 2009;373:1223. - PubMed
-
- Heath I. It is not wrong to say no. BMJ. 2009;338:b2529. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
