A comparison of mandibular denture base extension in conventional and implant-retained dentures
- PMID: 2033529
- DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90060-a
A comparison of mandibular denture base extension in conventional and implant-retained dentures
Abstract
A border outline for mandibular implant-retained dentures is described. The lingual extension of the impression is greatly reduced compared with a conventional mandibular denture. Because of the implant attachment, the shortened border is more comfortable and does not compromise denture retention. Improper implant position is also discussed with respect to denture extension.
Similar articles
-
Chairside method for incorporating metal O-ring attachment in mandibular implant-retained overdenture.N Y State Dent J. 2011 Aug-Sep;77(5):50-2. N Y State Dent J. 2011. PMID: 22029116
-
The transmandibular implant: prosthodontic treatment considerations.J Prosthet Dent. 1991 Nov;66(5):660-4. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90449-7. J Prosthet Dent. 1991. PMID: 1805005
-
The 2-visit CAD-CAM implant-retained overdenture: a clinical report.J Oral Implantol. 2014 Dec;40(6):722-8. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00237. J Oral Implantol. 2014. PMID: 23574574
-
Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: attachment systems, and number and locations of implants--Part I.J Ir Dent Assoc. 2015 Apr-May;61(2):93-7. J Ir Dent Assoc. 2015. PMID: 26281708 Review.
-
Principles and technique in sublingual flange extension and complete mandibular dentures.J Prosthet Dent. 1982 May;47(5):479-82. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(82)90293-1. J Prosthet Dent. 1982. PMID: 7045334 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Emerging Role of IL-10 in Hypertrophic Scars.Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Aug 27;7:438. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00438. eCollection 2020. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020. PMID: 32974363 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources