Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2010 Apr;125(4):1135-1145.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181d180ac.

Anatomical basis and versatile application of the free medial sural artery perforator flap for head and neck reconstruction

Affiliations
Case Reports

Anatomical basis and versatile application of the free medial sural artery perforator flap for head and neck reconstruction

Huang-Kai Kao et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The medial sural artery perforator flap is a thin and pliable flap. This study investigated the perforator topography of the medial sural artery perforator flap and its clinical application in head and neck reconstruction.

Methods: From January of 2005 to April of 2009, 29 patients with 29 medial gastrocnemius territories were evaluated. Among them, 26 patients underwent head and neck reconstruction using 26 medial sural artery perforator flaps. The number, location, and topographic patterns of the perforators were measured.

Results: Flap sizes ranged from 8 x 4 cm to 12 x 14 cm. The mean pedicle length was 12.7 cm, the mean flap thickness was 4.8 mm, the mean number of total perforators was 2.7 +/- 1.5 (range, 1 to 5), and the mean number of sizable perforators was 1.6 +/- 0.7 (range, 1 to 3). The mean distance from the perforator perpendicular to the popliteal crease was 11.4 +/- 2.7 cm. No perforators were found less than 6 cm or more than 18 cm from the popliteal crease. Most sizable perforators (85.4 percent) entered the medial gastrocnemius muscle at a relative distance of one-fifth to one-third of the lower leg length measured from the popliteal crease. All flaps survived, with good functional and aesthetic outcomes, except for one failed case.

Conclusion: The medial sural artery perforator flap is a good alternative for head and neck reconstruction, with the advantages of thin and pliable skin, a long and reliable vascular pedicle, straightforward intramuscular dissection, the possibility of chimeric flap design, and minimal donor-site morbidity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang CC, Lin CH. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2219–2230.
    1. Angrigiani C, Grilli D, Siebert J. Latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap without muscle. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96:1608–1614.
    1. Allen RJ, Tucker C Jr. Superior gluteal artery perforator free flap for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;95:1207–1212.
    1. Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg. 1993;91:678–683.
    1. Cavadas PC, Sanz-Gimenez-Rico JR, la Cámara AG, Navarro-Monzonís A, Soler-Nomdedeu S, Martínez-Soriano F. The medial sural artery perforator free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1609–1615.

Publication types