Expert opinion vs. patient perception of obstetrical outcomes in laboring women with birth plans
- PMID: 20337205
Expert opinion vs. patient perception of obstetrical outcomes in laboring women with birth plans
Abstract
Objective: To examine the differing views held by patients and medical personnel on outcomes of women with birth plans at the time of labor.
Study design: Antepartum patients who were at least 18 years old and English speaking, as well as physicians and nurses in the obstetric field, were asked to complete an anonymous survey on their opinions of the obstetric outcomes of women with birth plans.
Results: Sixty-five percent of medical personnel vs. 2.4% of patients reported that patients with birth plans had overall worse obstetric outcomes than patients without a birth plan. There were 65.7% of health care providers vs, 8.7% of patients who reported that women with a birth plan had an increased rate of cesarean section. In addition, 53.4% of health care providers vs. 9.9% of antepartum patients reported a perceived increased rate of chorioamnionitis for women with birth plans. Statistically significant differences were also found between health care providers and patients in terms of their perceptions of the effect of birth plans on operative vaginal delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, episiotomy and length of hospital stay.
Conclusion: This study revealed a large disparity between health care professionals' and antepartum patients' viewpoints on the obstetric outcomes of women with birth plans, including the rate of cesarean sections and chorioamnionitis.
Similar articles
-
Patients presenting with birth plans: a case-control study of delivery outcomes.J Reprod Med. 2007 Oct;52(10):884-7. J Reprod Med. 2007. PMID: 17977160
-
Practice variations between family physicians and obstetricians in the management of low-risk pregnancies.J Fam Pract. 1995 Apr;40(4):345-51. J Fam Pract. 1995. PMID: 7699347
-
Birth plans: tickets to the OR?MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2013 Sep-Oct;38(5):268-73; quiz 274-5. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0b013e31829a399d. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2013. PMID: 23797662
-
Episiotomy, hospital birth and cesarean section: technology gone haywire--what is the sutured tear rate at first births supposed to be?Midwifery Today Int Midwife. 2008 Spring;(85):24-5. Midwifery Today Int Midwife. 2008. PMID: 18429515 Review.
-
Birth plans: the good, the bad, and the future.J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006 Mar-Apr;35(2):295-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00042.x. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006. PMID: 16620258 Review.
Cited by
-
Hopes expressed in birth plans by women diagnosed with fetal anomalies: a qualitative study in Japan.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Oct 23;22(1):788. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05115-x. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 36274153 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Communication, Satisfaction, and Trust Before and After Use of a Standardized Birth Plan.Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2017 Nov;76(11):305-309. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2017. PMID: 29164014 Free PMC article.
-
Birth Plans: Encouraging Patient Engagement.J Perinat Educ. 2016;25(4):215-222. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.25.4.215. J Perinat Educ. 2016. PMID: 30643368 Free PMC article.
-
Birth Plans and Childbirth Education: What Are Provider Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practices?J Perinat Educ. 2019 Jan 1;28(1):10-18. doi: 10.1891/1058-1243.28.1.10. J Perinat Educ. 2019. PMID: 31086471 Free PMC article.