Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr 22;53(8):3305-19.
doi: 10.1021/jm100030u.

2-MeS-beta,gamma-CCl2-ATP is a potent agent for reducing intraocular pressure

Affiliations

2-MeS-beta,gamma-CCl2-ATP is a potent agent for reducing intraocular pressure

Shay Eliahu et al. J Med Chem. .

Abstract

Extracellular nucleotides can modify the production or drainage of the aqueous humor via activation of P2 receptors and therefore affect the intraocular pressure (IOP). We have synthesized slowly hydrolyzable nucleoside di- and triphosphate analogues, 1, and 8-14. Analogues 8-14 were completely resistant to hydrolysis by alkaline phosphatase over 30 min at 37 degrees C. In human blood serum, analogues 8-14 exhibited high stability, e.g., analogues 9 and 10-14 were only 15% and 0% degraded after 24 h, respectively. Moreover, analogues 8-14 were highly stable at pH 1.4 (t(1/2) 1 h-30 days). Analogues 8-14 were agonists of the P2Y(1) receptor (EC(50) 0.57-9.54 muM). Ocular administration of most analogues into rabbits reduced IOP, e.g., analogue 9 reduced IOP by 32% (EC(50) 95.5 nM). Analogue 9 was more effective at reducing IOP than several common glaucoma drugs and represents a promising alternative to timolol maleate, which cannot be used for the treatment of patients suffering from asthma or cardiac problems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structures of previously tested nucleotides.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structures of nucleotides tested in this study.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Rates of hydrolysis of analogues 9 and 10B at pH 1.4 at 37 °C, as monitored by HPLC. Hydrolysis of 7.5 mM analogue 9 or 10B in KCl/HCl buffer at pH 1.4 and 37 °C was recorded for 5 days at 7–17 h intervals. (A) HPLC chromatograms of analogue 9 and hydrolysates at t = 6, 52, 216 h. (B) Kinetics of acidic hydrolysis of analogue 9 (t1/2 = 65 h) and time-dependent formation of degradation products. (C) Kinetics of acidic hydrolysis of analogue 10B (t1/2 = 8 h).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Hydrolysis of ATP and analogues 1, 8, and 9 in human blood serum (180 μL) and RPMI-1640 medium (540 μL) over 24 h at 37 °C, as monitored by HPLC. (A) Hydrolysis of 0.25 mM ATP and production of ADP and AMP. (B) Degradation of analogues 1, 8, and 9 in human blood serum.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Effect of analogues 1, 8–9, and 11–14 (100 μM) on rabbit IOP measured over 8 h vs control: (1) an equal volume of saline was administered to the contralateral eye; (2) an equal volume of saline was administered to other animals. IOP was measured twice before the application of any drug and was nearly identical in all animals. (B) Time course for the effects of analogues 1, 9, 13, and 14 (100 μM) on rabbit IOP over 8 h vs control. Values are the means ± SEM of results from 10 independent experiments. (C) Time-course for the effects of analogues 11B, 12A, and 12B (100 μM) on rabbit IOP over 8 h. Values are the means ± SEM of results from eight independent experiments. (D)Dose–response curves for the maximal effectsof analogues 1, 9, 13, and 14 (100 μM) on rabbit IOP. Values are the means ± SEM of results from eight independent experiments. (E) Maximal effects of analogues 1 and 9 (100 μM, 10 μL) on rabbit IOP, as compared to latanoprost (0.005%), dorzolamide hydrochloride (2%), and timolol maleate (0.5%) applied in 40 μL, as compared to control. (F) Duration of the effects of analogues 1 and 9 (100 μM, 10 μL), as compared to latanoprost (0.005%), dorzolamide hydrochloride (2%), and timolol maleate (0.5%) applied in 40 μL, as compared to control. The duration of the effect, termed mean-time effect, was calculated as the time between 50% maximal decrease in IOP after drug administration and a 50% recovery of the initial IOP value.
Scheme 1<sup><i>a</i></sup>
Scheme 1a
aReaction conditions for analogue 8: (a) trimethylphosphate, POCl3, proton sponge, 0 °C, 3 h; (b) 0.5 M bis(tributylammonium)difluoromethylene diphosphonate in dry DMF, Bu3N, 0 °C, 1.5 h; (c) 0.5 M TEAB, pH 7, RT, 1 h; (d) (1) 18% HCl, pH 2.3, RT, 3 h, (2) 24% NH4OH, pH 9, RT, 45 min. Reaction conditions for analogue 9: (a) trimethylphosphate, POCl3, proton sponge, 0 °C, 1 h; (b) 1 M bis(tributylammonium)dichloromethylene diphosphonate in dry DMF, Bu3N, 0 °C, 40 min, and then RT, 5 min; (c) 0.5 M TEAB, pH 7, RT, 1 h; (d) as described for analogue 8.
Scheme 2<sup><i>a</i></sup>
Scheme 2a
aReaction conditions for analogue 10: (a) trimethylphosphate, PCl3, proton sponge, 0 °C, 30 min; (b) 0.5 M bis(tributylammonium)dichloromethylene diphosphonate in dry DMF, Bu3N, 0 °C, 1 h; (c) 2 M BH3·SMe in THF, 0 °C, 5 min, and then RT, 60 min; (d) 0.5 M TEAB, pH 7, RT, 1 h; (e) (1) 18% HCl, pH 2.3, RT, 3 h, (2) 24% NH4OH, pH 9, RT, 45 min. Reaction conditions for analogue 11: (a) trimethylphosphate, PCl3, proton sponge, 0 °C, 30 min; (b) 0.5 M bis(tributylammonium)dichloromethylene diphosphonate in dry DMF, Bu3N, 0 °C, 25 min; (c) 2 M BH3·SMe2 in THF, 0 °C, 5 min and then RT, 25 min; (d) 0.5 M TEAB, pH 7, RT, 45 min; (e) as described for analogue 10. Reaction conditions for analogue 12: (a) trimethylphosphate, PCl3, proton sponge, 0 °C, 45 min; (b) 0.5 M bis(tributylammonium)difluoromethylene diphosphonate in dry DMF, Bu3N, 0 °C, 50 min; (c) 2 M BH3·SMe in THF, 0 °C, 5 min then RT, 60 min; (d) and (e) as described for analogue 10.
Scheme 3<sup><i>a</i></sup>
Scheme 3a
aReaction conditions for analogue 15: (a) CH2Cl2, DMAP, TsCl, RT, 12 h; (b) tetra-(n-butylammonium)difluoromethylene diphosphonate in dry DMF, RT, 72 h; (c) (1) 18% HCl, pH 2.3, RT, 3 h; (2) 24% NH4OH, pH 9, RT, 45 min. Reaction conditions for analogue 33: (a) CH2Cl2, DMAP, TsCl, RT, 12 h; (b) tetra-(n-butylammonium) dichloromethylene diphosphonate in dry DMF, RT, 72 h; (c) TFA, argon bubbling, RT, 10 min.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Williams M, Jarvis MF. Purinergic and pyrimidinergic receptors as potential drug targets. Biochem Pharmacol. 2000;59:1173–1185. - PubMed
    1. Guile SD, Ince F, Ingall AH, Kindon ND, Meghani P, Mortimore MP. The medicinal chemistry of the P2 receptor family. Prog Med Chem. 2001;38:115–187. - PubMed
    1. Fischer B. Therapeutic applications of ATP-(P2)-receptors agonists and antagonists. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 1999;9:385–399.
    1. Hillmann P, Ko GY, Spinrath A, Raulf A, von Kugelgen I, Wolff SC, Nicholas RA, Kostenis E, Holtje HD, Muller CE. Key Determinants of nucleotide-activated G protein-coupled P2Y2 receptor function revealed by chemical and pharmacological experiments, mutagenesis and homology modeling. J Med Chem. 2009;52:2762–2775. - PubMed
    1. Burnstock G, Verkhratsky A. Evolutionary origins of the purinergic signalling system. Acta Physiol. 2009;195:415–447. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources