Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry
- PMID: 20338191
- DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.010
Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry
Abstract
A previous study has shown that diverting attention from binocular rivalry to a visual distractor task results in a slowing of rivalry alternation rate between simple orthogonal orientations. Here, we investigate whether the slowing of visual perceptual alternations will occur when attention is diverted to an auditory distractor task, and we extend the investigation by testing this for two kinds of binocular rivalry stimuli and for the Necker cube. Our results show that doing the auditory attention task does indeed slow visual perceptual alternations, that the slowing effect is a graded function of attentional load, and that the attentional slowing effect is less pronounced for grating rivalry than for house/face rivalry and for the Necker cube. These results are explained in terms of supramodal attentional resources modulating a high-level interpretative process in perceptual ambiguity, together with a role for feedback to early visual processes in the case of binocular rivalry.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Attention speeds binocular rivalry.Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;17(9):752-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01777.x. Psychol Sci. 2006. PMID: 16984290
-
Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures.J Vis. 2004 Jul 1;4(7):539-51. doi: 10.1167/4.7.2. J Vis. 2004. PMID: 15330700 Free PMC article.
-
Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry.Vision Res. 2005 Jan;45(1):29-40. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.07.039. Vision Res. 2005. PMID: 15571736
-
Interacting competitive selection in attention and binocular rivalry.Prog Brain Res. 2005;149:227-34. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(05)49016-0. Prog Brain Res. 2005. PMID: 16226587 Review.
-
How does binocular rivalry emerge from cortical mechanisms of 3-D vision?Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(21):2232-50. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.024. Epub 2008 Aug 13. Vision Res. 2008. PMID: 18640145 Review.
Cited by
-
Binocular rivalry: frontal activity relates to introspection and action but not to perception.J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 29;34(5):1738-47. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4403-13.2014. J Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24478356 Free PMC article.
-
Attentional modulation of binocular rivalry.Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Sep 27;5:105. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00105. eCollection 2011. Front Hum Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 22046156 Free PMC article.
-
Direction-selective modulation of visual motion rivalry by collocated tactile motion.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Apr;84(3):899-914. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02453-y. Epub 2022 Feb 22. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022. PMID: 35194773 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptual rivalry: reflexes reveal the gradual nature of visual awareness.PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020910. Epub 2011 Jun 3. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21677786 Free PMC article.
-
Attention modulation of stimulus rivalry under swapping paradigm.Iperception. 2014 Aug 4;5(3):147-52. doi: 10.1068/i0621. eCollection 2014. Iperception. 2014. PMID: 25469220 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources