Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2010 May 1;93(7):2169-74.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.02.054. Epub 2010 Mar 24.

The use of complementary and alternative fertility treatment in couples seeking fertility care: data from a prospective cohort in the United States

James F Smith  1 , Michael L Eisenberg, Susan G Millstein, Robert D Nachtigall, Alan W Shindel, Holly Wing, Marcelle Cedars, Lauri Pasch, Patricia P Katz; Infertility Outcomes Program Project Group
Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

The use of complementary and alternative fertility treatment in couples seeking fertility care: data from a prospective cohort in the United States

James F Smith et al. Fertil Steril. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use among couples seeking fertility care and to identify the predictors of CAM use in this population.

Design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Eight community and academic infertility practices.

Patient(s): A total of 428 couples presenting for an infertility evaluation.

Intervention(s): Interviews and questionnaires.

Main outcome measure(s): Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine therapy.

Result(s): After 18 months of observation, 29% of the couples had utilized a CAM modality for treatment of infertility; 22% had tried acupuncture, 17% herbal therapy, 5% a form of body work, and 1% meditation. An annual household income of > or = $200,000 (odds ratio 2.8, relative to couples earning <$100,000), not achieving a pregnancy (odds ratio 2.3), and a positive attitude toward CAM use at baseline were independently associated with CAM use.

Conclusion(s): A substantial minority of infertile couples use CAM treatments. CAM was chosen most commonly by wealthier couples, those not achieving a pregnancy, and those with a baseline belief in the effectiveness of CAM treatments.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Chandra A, Stephen EH. Impaired fecundity in the United States: 1982–1995. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30:34–42. - PubMed
    1. Stephen EH, Chandra A. Updated projections of infertility in the United States: 1995–2025. Fertility and Sterility. 1998;70:30–4. - PubMed
    1. Oakley L, Doyle P, Maconochie N. Lifetime prevalence of infertility and infertility treatment in the UK: results from a population-based survey of reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:447–50. - PubMed
    1. Stephen EH, Chandra A. Declining estimates of infertility in the United States: 1982–2002. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:516–23. - PubMed
    1. Wyshak G. Infertility in American college alumnae. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001;73:237–42. - PubMed

Publication types