Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jul;23(7):743-8.
doi: 10.1038/ajh.2010.57. Epub 2010 Mar 25.

Estimation of 24-h sodium excretion from a spot urine sample using chloride and creatinine dipsticks

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Estimation of 24-h sodium excretion from a spot urine sample using chloride and creatinine dipsticks

Samuel J Mann et al. Am J Hypertens. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Despite its clinical relevance, sodium intake is seldom monitored by physicians, largely because of shortcomings of the 24-h urine collection for sodium excretion. In a prior study, sodium excretion was shown to be accurately estimated from a late afternoon/early evening spot urine sodium/creatinine ratio, adjusted for 24-h creatinine excretion. In this study, we assessed a more convenient and inexpensive method, using chloride and creatinine dipsticks.

Methods: Subjects submitted 24-h urine collections along with an "AM sample," collected at the beginning, a "PM sample" collected in the late afternoon/early evening before dinner, at roughly the midpoint, and a "random sample," collected after completion, of the 24-h collection. Predicted 24-h sodium excretion was then determined from the spot urine dipstick chloride/creatinine ratio, measured by two independent observers, and from the spot urine laboratory sodium/creatinine ratio. Both ratios were adjusted for 24-h creatinine excretion.

Results: For PM samples, predicted sodium excretion correlated strongly with actual 24-h sodium excretion, both for the dipstick method (r = 0.71; observer 1 and r = 0.65; observer 2; both P < 0.001), and the laboratory method (r = 0.86, P < 0.001). PM samples also differentiated subjects with sodium excretion <100 mEq/day vs. > or =100 mEq/day (sensitivity and specificity: dipstick method: 83 and 82%, respectively for observer 1, 89 and 77%, respectively, for observer 2; laboratory method: 100 and 82%, respectively). AM samples and random samples correlated less strongly.

Conclusion: The dipstick method appears promising as a convenient and inexpensive means to serially assess sodium excretion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types