Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jan-Feb;76(1):107-12.
doi: 10.1590/S1808-86942010000100018.

Maternal and paternal age, birth order and interpregnancy interval evaluation for cleft lip-palate

Affiliations

Maternal and paternal age, birth order and interpregnancy interval evaluation for cleft lip-palate

Daniella Reis Barbosa Martelli et al. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Cleft lip and palate (CL/P) are the most common congenital craniofacial anomalies.

Aim: To evaluate environmental risk factors for non-syndromic CL/P in a reference care center in Minas Gerais.

Materials and methods: we carried out a case-controlled study, assessing 100 children with clefts and 100 children without clinical alterations. The analysis dimensions (age, skin color, gender, fissure classification, maternal and paternal age, birth order and interpregnancy interval), obtained from a questionnaire; and later we build a data base and the analyses were carried out by the SPSS 17.0 software. The results were analyzed with the relative risk for each variable, in order to estimate the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval, followed by a bivariate and multivariate analysis.

Results: among 200 children, 54% were males and 46% were females. As far as skin color is concerned most were brown, white and black, respectively. Cleft palates were the most common fissures found (54%), followed by lip cleft (30%) and palate cleft (16%).

Conclusion: although with a limited sample, we noticed an association between maternal age and an increased risk for cleft lip and palate; however, paternal age, pregnancy order and interpregnancy interval were not significant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. OPCS . Notifications 1992. HMSO; London: 1995. Congenital malformation statistics.
    1. Kot M, Kruk-Jeromini J. Analysis of family incidence of cleft lip and/ or palate. Med Sci Monit. 2007;13(3):231–234. - PubMed
    1. Cobourne MT. The complex genetics of cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod. 2004;26(4):7–16. - PubMed
    1. Fogh-Andersen P. Inherance of harelip and cleft palate: contribution to the elucidation of the etiology of the congenital clefts of the face 1942 [Dissertation] Busck; Copenhagen: 1942.
    1. Tolarová MM, Cervenka J. Classification and birth prevalence of orofacial clefts. Am J Med Genet. 1998;75(2):126–137. - PubMed

Uncited Reference

    1. Martelli-Junior H, Porto LCVP, Barbosa DRB, Bonan PRF, Freitas AB, Coletta RD. Prevalence of nonsyndromic oral clefts in a reference hospital in Minas Gerais State, between 2000-2005. Braz Oral Res. 2007;21(4):314–317. - PubMed