Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;55(3):209-15.
doi: 10.1007/s00038-010-0137-4. Epub 2010 Mar 26.

Socioeconomic status as determinant for participation in mammography screening: assessing the difference between using women's own versus their partner's

Affiliations

Socioeconomic status as determinant for participation in mammography screening: assessing the difference between using women's own versus their partner's

Malin Kjellén et al. Int J Public Health. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: Earlier research has shown that participation in mammography screening tends to vary across socioeconomic levels. We assessed the difference between using the woman's own socioeconomic status (SES) and using that of her household or partner as determinant of participation in mammography screening.

Methods: Participation data from two mammography screening programs in Denmark were linked to a national SES classification system providing data for each citizen, their partner, and household. We calculated the odds ratio of non-participation across SES levels using the woman's own, the household's, and her partner's SES status, respectively.

Results: When using the woman's own SES, the odds ratio of non-participation showed a clear U-shape across SES levels, in both programs. When using the partner's SES the difference in non-participation across SES levels was significantly smaller (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: To what extent SES was a determinant for screening participation strongly depended on whether using the woman's own SES or that of her partner. In a public health perspective it is important to take this into account when addressing the problem of non-attendance in screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Nov;16(11):2293-303 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2005 Jan 29;330(7485):220 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2006 Jun;15(3):242-8 - PubMed
    1. Breast Cancer Res. 2002;4(1):R1 - PubMed
    1. Prev Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;41(3-4):728-33 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources