Needs assessments can identify scores on HRQOL questionnaires that represent problems for patients: an illustration with the Supportive Care Needs Survey and the QLQ-C30
- PMID: 20340048
- PMCID: PMC5831364
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-010-9636-2
Needs assessments can identify scores on HRQOL questionnaires that represent problems for patients: an illustration with the Supportive Care Needs Survey and the QLQ-C30
Abstract
Purpose: A barrier to using HRQOL questionnaires for individual patient management is knowing what score represents a problem deserving attention. We explored using needs assessments to identify HRQOL scores associated with patient-reported unmet needs.
Methods: This cross-sectional study included 117 cancer patients (mean age 61 years; 51% men; 77% white) who completed the Supportive Care Needs Survey (SCNS) and EORTC QLQ-C30. SCNS scores were dichotomized as "no unmet need" versus "some unmet need" and served as an external criterion for identifying problem scores. We evaluated the discriminative ability of QLQ-C30 scores using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Domains with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) >or= .70 were examined further to determine how well QLQ-C30 scores predicted presence/absence of unmet need.
Results: We found AUCs >or= .70 for 6 of 14 EORTC domains: physical, emotional, role, global QOL, pain, fatigue. All 6 domains had sensitivity >or= .85 and specificity >or= .50. EORTC domains that closely matched the content of SCNS item(s) were more likely to have AUCs >or= .70. The appropriate cut-off depends on the relative importance of false positives and false negatives.
Conclusions: Needs assessments can identify HRQOL scores requiring clinicians' attention. Future research should confirm these findings using other HRQOL questionnaires and needs assessments.
Figures
References
-
- Aaronson NK, Snyder C. Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: Proceedings of an international society for quality of life research conference. Quality of Life Research. 2008;17:1295. - PubMed
-
- Donaldson G. Patient-reported outcomes and the mandate of measurement. Quality of Life Research. 2009;18:1303–1313. - PubMed
-
- Aaronson NK, Cull AM, Kaasa S, Sprangers MAG. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) modular approach to quality of life assessment in oncology: An update. In: Spilker B, editor. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. pp. 179–189.
-
- Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, et al. Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2004;22:714–724. - PubMed
-
- Gustafson DH. Needs assessment in cancer. In: Lipscomb J, Gotay CC, Snyder C, editors. Outcomes assessment in cancer: Measures, methods, and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. pp. 305–328.