The International Normalized Ratio (INR) in the MELD score: problems and solutions
- PMID: 20346070
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03064.x
The International Normalized Ratio (INR) in the MELD score: problems and solutions
Abstract
The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is widely used to prioritize patients for liver transplantation. One of the pitfalls of the MELD score is the interlaboratory variability in all three components of the score (INR, bilirubin, creatinine). The interlaboratory variability in the INR has the largest impact on the MELD score, with a mean difference of around 5 MELD points in most studies. During the 3rd conference on Coagulopathy and Liver disease, a multidisciplinary group of scientists and physicians discussed possible solutions for the INR problem in the MELD score with the intention to provide a constructive contribution to the international debate on this issue. Here we will discuss possible solutions and highlight advantages and disadvantages.
Similar articles
-
Interlaboratory variability in assessment of the model of end-stage liver disease score.Liver Int. 2008 Dec;28(10):1344-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01783.x. Epub 2008 May 14. Liver Int. 2008. PMID: 18482269
-
The international normalized ratio of prothrombin time in the model for end-stage liver disease score: a reliable measure.Clin Liver Dis. 2009 Feb;13(1):63-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2008.09.001. Clin Liver Dis. 2009. PMID: 19150310 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of laboratory-induced MELD score differences on liver allocation: more reality than myth.Clin Transplant. 2012 Jan-Feb;26(1):E62-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01538.x. Epub 2011 Oct 27. Clin Transplant. 2012. PMID: 22032173
-
From vitamin K antagonists to liver international normalized ratio: a historical journey and critical perspective.Semin Thromb Hemost. 2014 Nov;40(8):845-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1395160. Epub 2014 Nov 13. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2014. PMID: 25393635 Review.
-
[The value of MELD in the allocation of priority for liver transplantation candidates].Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Apr;33(4):330-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Jul 23. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010. PMID: 19631411 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Analysis of clinical features and prognostic factors in patients with hepatic hydrothorax: a single-center study from China.BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02412-9. BMC Gastroenterol. 2022. PMID: 35799114 Free PMC article.
-
Coagulation in chronic liver disease and the use of prothrombin complex concentrate for an emergent procedure: a case report and review of literature.J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2018 Jun 12;8(3):138-141. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2018.1466600. eCollection 2018. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2018. PMID: 29915653 Free PMC article.
-
Artificial intelligence-based evaluation of prognosis in cirrhosis.J Transl Med. 2024 Oct 14;22(1):933. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05726-2. J Transl Med. 2024. PMID: 39402630 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparative analysis on characteristics of two activated partial thromboplastin time reagents.J Clin Lab Anal. 2022 Sep;36(9):e24608. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24608. Epub 2022 Jul 19. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022. PMID: 35853032 Free PMC article.
-
The evolution in the prioritization for liver transplantation.Ann Gastroenterol. 2012;25(1):6-13. Ann Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 24713804 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources