Tailoring the process of informed consent in genetic and genomic research
- PMID: 20346094
- PMCID: PMC2873798
- DOI: 10.1186/gm141
Tailoring the process of informed consent in genetic and genomic research
Abstract
Genomic science and associated technologies are facilitating an unprecedented rate of discovery of novel insights into the relationship between human genetic variation and health. The willingness of large numbers of individuals from different ethnic and cultural backgrounds to donate biological samples is one of the major factors behind the success of the ongoing genomic revolution. Although current informed consent documents and processes demonstrate a commitment to ensuring that study participants are well informed of the risks and benefits of participating in genomic studies, there continues to be a need to develop effective new approaches for adequately informing participants of the changing complexities of the scientific and ethical issues that arise in the conduct of genomics research. Examples of these complexities in genomic research include more widespread use of whole-genome sequencing technologies, broad sharing of individual-level data, evolving information technology, the growing demand for the return of genetic results to participants, and changing attitudes about privacy and the expansion of genomics studies to global populations representing diverse cultural, linguistic and socio-economic backgrounds. We highlight and briefly discuss the importance of ten core scientific, cultural and social factors that are particularly relevant to tailoring informed consent in genomic research, and we draw attention to the need for the informed consent document and process to be responsive to the evolving nature of genomic research.
References
-
- Department of Health and Human Services (USA), National Institutes of Health, Office for Protection from Research Risks. Title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46 - Protection of Human Subjects (45CFR 46) Federal Register 56, Bethesda, Maryland: Department of Health and Human Services; 2001.
-
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Ottawa, Canada: Public Works and Government Services; 1998.
-
- CIOMS/WHO (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences/World Health Organization) International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization/CIOMS; 2002.
-
- Nuffield Council of Bioethics. The Ethics of Healthcare in Developing Countries. London: Nuffield Council of Bioethics; 2002.
-
- World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki, Adopted by the WMA General Assembly, Helsinki, 1964, Amended 1975, 1983, 1989, 1996, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2008. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html