AHRQ series editorial: public involvement improves methods development in comparative effectiveness reviews
- PMID: 20346860
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.018
AHRQ series editorial: public involvement improves methods development in comparative effectiveness reviews
Similar articles
-
AHRQ series commentary 1: rating the evidence in comparative effectiveness reviews.J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):474-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.003. Epub 2010 Feb 26. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010. PMID: 20189352 No abstract available.
-
AHRQ series commentary 2: informative, timely, and valuable: an outsider view of the comparative effectiveness review articles.J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):476-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.001. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010. PMID: 20346861 No abstract available.
-
AHRQ series paper 1: comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):481-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.009. Epub 2008 Oct 1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010. PMID: 18834715
-
AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):502-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.007. Epub 2008 Sep 26. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010. PMID: 18823754 Review.
-
Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1168-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.022. Epub 2011 Jun 17. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21684115 Review.
Cited by
-
A CTSA agenda to advance methods for comparative effectiveness research.Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Jun;4(3):188-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00282.x. Clin Transl Sci. 2011. PMID: 21707950 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources