Mixing characterisation of full-scale membrane bioreactors: CFD modelling with experimental validation
- PMID: 20347471
- DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.029
Mixing characterisation of full-scale membrane bioreactors: CFD modelling with experimental validation
Abstract
Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs) have been successfully used in aerobic biological wastewater treatment to solve the perennial problem of effective solids-liquid separation. The optimisation of MBRs requires knowledge of the membrane fouling, biokinetics and mixing. However, research has mainly concentrated on the fouling and biokinetics (Ng and Kim, 2007). Current methods of design for a desired flow regime within MBRs are largely based on assumptions (e.g. complete mixing of tanks) and empirical techniques (e.g. specific mixing energy). However, it is difficult to predict how sludge rheology and vessel design in full-scale installations affects hydrodynamics, hence overall performance. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) provides a method for prediction of how vessel features and mixing energy usage affect the hydrodynamics. In this study, a CFD model was developed which accounts for aeration, sludge rheology and geometry (i.e. bioreactor and membrane module). This MBR CFD model was then applied to two full-scale MBRs and was successfully validated against experimental results. The effect of sludge settling and rheology was found to have a minimal impact on the bulk mixing (i.e. the residence time distribution).
Similar articles
-
Comparison of four types of membrane bioreactor systems in terms of shear stress over the membrane surface using computational fluid dynamics.Water Sci Technol. 2013;68(12):2534-44. doi: 10.2166/wst.2013.515. Water Sci Technol. 2013. PMID: 24355838
-
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.Indian J Environ Health. 2001 Apr;43(2):1-82. Indian J Environ Health. 2001. PMID: 12397675 Review.
-
Activated sludge model (ASM) based modelling of membrane bioreactor (MBR) processes: a critical review with special regard to MBR specificities.Water Res. 2010 Aug;44(15):4272-94. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Jun 11. Water Res. 2010. PMID: 20619870 Review.
-
Experimental and CFD simulation studies of wall shear stress for different impeller configurations and MBR activated sludge.Water Sci Technol. 2012;65(11):2061-70. doi: 10.2166/wst.2012.106. Water Sci Technol. 2012. PMID: 22592479
-
Membrane bioreactors for final treatment of wastewater.Water Sci Technol. 2003;48(8):103-10. Water Sci Technol. 2003. PMID: 14682576
Cited by
-
Application of jetventurimixer for developing low-energy-demand and highly efficient aeration process of wastewater treatment.Heliyon. 2022 Oct 15;8(10):e11096. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11096. eCollection 2022 Oct. Heliyon. 2022. PMID: 36281403 Free PMC article.
-
Computational fluid dynamics simulation as a tool for optimizing the hydrodynamic performance of membrane bioreactors.RSC Adv. 2019 Oct 9;9(55):32034-32046. doi: 10.1039/c9ra06706j. eCollection 2019 Oct 7. RSC Adv. 2019. PMID: 35530793 Free PMC article.
-
Hydrodynamics of an electrochemical membrane bioreactor.Sci Rep. 2015 May 22;5:10387. doi: 10.1038/srep10387. Sci Rep. 2015. PMID: 25997399 Free PMC article.
-
Membrane BioReactor (MBR) Activated Sludge Surrogate Alternatives Carboxymethyl Cellulose and Xanthan Gum: A Statistical Analysis and Review.Membranes (Basel). 2022 Sep 20;12(10):909. doi: 10.3390/membranes12100909. Membranes (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36295668 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous