[What to do if the intraocular pressure measurement does not appear reliable]
- PMID: 20347507
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2010.02.007
[What to do if the intraocular pressure measurement does not appear reliable]
Abstract
Among the various intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement methods available today, Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) remains the gold standard for in-office routine IOP measurement. However, numerous factors may affect IOP measurement with GAT, namely corneal features. Before any interpretation of an IOP value, the measurement conditions should be checked and the central corneal thickness evaluated, since GAT overestimates IOP in thick corneas and underestimates IOP in thin ones. When GAT is not applicable, other IOP measurement devices, which have their own limits, are available. For example, the ocular response analyzer (ORA) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) provide IOP readings that are less influenced by corneal properties and may be useful after refractive surgery. Regardless of the choice of tonometer, the IOP value must not be considered alone but from a clinical point of view, including, namely, multiple IOP measurements over a day since the IOP fluctuates over a 24-h time period. A complete clinical examination is necessary in each case to search for glaucomatous neuropathy.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.Ophthalmology. 2010 Apr;117(4):730-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.020. Epub 2010 Feb 1. Ophthalmology. 2010. PMID: 20122737 Clinical Trial.
-
Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.J Glaucoma. 2008 Aug;17(5):361-5. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815c3ad3. J Glaucoma. 2008. PMID: 18703945
-
The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 Sep;50(9):4229-36. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2955. Epub 2009 Apr 30. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009. PMID: 19407025
-
Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data.Surv Ophthalmol. 2008 May-Jun;53(3):203-18. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.02.005. Surv Ophthalmol. 2008. PMID: 18501267 Review.
-
New ways to measure intraocular pressure.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;19(2):122-6. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3282f391ae. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2008. PMID: 18301285 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources