Dissemination of health information through social networks: twitter and antibiotics
- PMID: 20347636
- PMCID: PMC3601456
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.11.004
Dissemination of health information through social networks: twitter and antibiotics
Abstract
Background: This study reviewed Twitter status updates mentioning "antibiotic(s)" to determine overarching categories and explore evidence of misunderstanding or misuse of antibiotics.
Methods: One thousand Twitter status updates mentioning antibiotic(s) were randomly selected for content analysis and categorization. To explore cases of potential misunderstanding or misuse, these status updates were mined for co-occurrence of the following terms: "cold + antibiotic(s)," "extra + antibiotic(s)," "flu + antibiotic(s)," "leftover + antibiotic(s)," and "share + antibiotic(s)" and reviewed to confirm evidence of misuse or misunderstanding.
Results: Of the 1000 status updates, 971 were categorized into 11 groups: general use (n = 289), advice/information (n = 157), side effects/negative reactions (n = 113), diagnosis (n = 102), resistance (n = 92), misunderstanding and/or misuse (n = 55), positive reactions (n = 48), animals (n = 46), other (n = 42), wanting/needing (n = 19), and cost (n = 8). Cases of misunderstanding or abuse were identified for the following combinations: "flu + antibiotic(s)" (n = 345), "cold + antibiotic(s)" (n = 302), "leftover + antibiotic(s)" (n = 23), "share + antibiotic(s)" (n = 10), and "extra + antibiotic(s)" (n = 7).
Conclusion: Social media sites offer means of health information sharing. Further study is warranted to explore how such networks may provide a venue to identify misuse or misunderstanding of antibiotics, promote positive behavior change, disseminate valid information, and explore how such tools can be used to gather real-time health data.
2010 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
IT network, distribution of health infection on infectious disease, and need for quality control on data.Am J Infect Control. 2011 Feb;39(1):85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.04.218. Am J Infect Control. 2011. PMID: 21281892 No abstract available.
References
-
- The Experts vs. the Amateurs: A Tug of War over the Future of Media. Knowledge@Wharton 2009. 2008. Mar 19, [cited 2009 April 17]. Available from: http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article.cfm?articleid=1921.
-
- Edelman . Edelman; 2009. 2009 Edelman Trust Barometer.
-
- Moturu ST, Liu H, Johnson WG. Trust evaluation in health information on the World Wide Web. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008; 2008. pp. 1525–1528. - PubMed
-
- Fox S, Jones S. The Social Life of Health Information. Pew Internet & American Life Project. 2009
