Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr;39 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i21-31.
doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq036.

Standards for CHERG reviews of intervention effects on child survival

Affiliations

Standards for CHERG reviews of intervention effects on child survival

Neff Walker et al. Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) uses estimates of the effects of interventions on cause-specific child mortality as a basis for generating projections of child lives that could be saved by increasing coverage of effective interventions. Estimates of intervention effects are an essential element of LiST, and need to reflect the best available scientific evidence. This article describes the guidelines developed by the Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group (CHERG) that are applied by scientists conducting reviews of intervention effects for use in LiST.

Methods: The guidelines build on and extend those developed by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Working Group for Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). They reflect the experience gained by the CHERG intervention review groups in conducting the reviews published in this volume, and will continue to be refined through future reviews. Presentation of the guidelines Expected products and guidelines are described for six steps in the CHERG intervention review process: (i) defining the scope of the review; (ii) conducting the literature search; (iii) extracting information from individual studies; (iv) assessing and summarizing the evidence; (v) translating the evidence into estimates of intervention effects and (vi) presenting the results.

Conclusions: The CHERG intervention reviews represent an ambitious effort to summarize existing evidence and use it as the basis for supporting sound public health decision making through LiST. These efforts will continue, and a similar process is now under way to assess intervention effects for reducing maternal mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Steps in the CHERG intervention reviews
Figure 2
Figure 2
Standard flow diagram for CHERG intervention reviews, showing the search strategy and outcomes

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cochrane website. [(13 June 2009, date last accessed)]. http://www.cochrane.org.
    1. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D Stroup DF for the QUORM Group. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trial: the QUOROM statement. Lancet. 1999;354:1896–900. - PubMed
    1. GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490–98. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bryce J, Boschi-Pinto C, Shibuya K, Black RE and the WHO Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group. WHO estimates of the causes of death in children. Lancet. 2005;365:1147–52. - PubMed
    1. CAB abstracts. [(13 June 2009, date last accessed)]. Available at http://www.cabi.org/datapage.asp?iDocID=165.

Publication types