Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar;16(1):60-71.
doi: 10.1037/a0018629.

Generalized "satisfaction of search": adverse influences on dual-target search accuracy

Affiliations

Generalized "satisfaction of search": adverse influences on dual-target search accuracy

Mathias S Fleck et al. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

The successful detection of a target in a radiological search can reduce the detectability of a second target, a phenomenon termed satisfaction of search (SOS). Given the potential consequences, here we investigate the generality of SOS with the goal of simultaneously informing radiology, cognitive psychology, and nonmedical searches such as airport luggage screening. Ten experiments utilizing nonmedical searches and untrained searchers suggest that SOS is affected by a diverse array of factors, including (1) the relative frequency of different target types, (2) external pressures (reward and time), and (3) expectations about the number of targets present. Collectively, these experiments indicate that SOS arises when searchers have a biased expectation about the low likelihood of specific targets or events, and when they are under pressure to perform efficiently. This first demonstration of SOS outside of radiology implicates a general heuristic applicable to many kinds of searches. In an example like airport luggage screening, the current data suggest that the detection of an easy-to-spot target (e.g., a water bottle) might reduce detection of a hard-to-spot target (e.g., a box cutter).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sample search display for Experiments 1–10. Each trial contained 0, 1, or 2 T-shaped targets among the L-shaped distractors. Experiments 7 and 8 additionally displayed a row of “luggage” icons across the top of the display.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ashman CJ, Yu JS, Wolfman D. Satisfaction of search in osteoradiology. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2000;177:252–253. - PubMed
    1. Berbaum KS, El-Khoury GY, Franken EA, Jr, Kuehn DM, Meis DM, Dorfman DD, et al. Missed fractures resulting from satisfaction of search effect. Emergency Radiology. 1994;1:242–249.
    1. Berbaum KS, Franken EA, Jr, Caldwell RT, Schartz KM. Satisfaction of search in traditional radiographic imaging. In: Samei EA, Krupinski E, editors. The handbook of medical image perception and techniques. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
    1. Berbaum KS, Franken EA, Jr, Dorfman DD, Caldwell RT, Krupinski EA. Role of faulty decision making in the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiography. Academic Radiology. 2000;7:1098–1106. - PubMed
    1. Berbaum KS, Franken EA, Jr, Dorfman DD, Miller EM, Caldwell RT, Kuehn DM, et al. Role of faulty visual search in the satisfaction of search effect in chest radiography. Academic Radiology. 1998;5:9–19. - PubMed

Publication types