Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 May 10;28(14):2396-403.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.8433. Epub 2010 Mar 29.

Patterns and correlates of adjuvant radiotherapy receipt after lumpectomy and after mastectomy for breast cancer

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Patterns and correlates of adjuvant radiotherapy receipt after lumpectomy and after mastectomy for breast cancer

Reshma Jagsi et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To use patient self-report to provide more valid estimates of whether radiotherapy (RT) is underutilized than possible with registry data, as well as to evaluate for disparities and the influence of preferences and provider interactions.

Methods: We considered 2,260 survey respondents who had nonmetastatic breast cancer, were age 20 to 79 years, were diagnosed between July 2005 and February 2007 in Detroit and Los Angeles, and reported to Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registries (72% response rate). Survey responses were merged with SEER data. We assessed rates and correlates of RT receipt among all patients with invasive cancer receiving breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and among patients undergoing mastectomy with indications for RT (ie, positive lymph nodes or T3-4 tumors).

Results: Among 904 patients undergoing BCS with strong indications for RT, 95.4% received RT, and 77.6% received RT among the 135 patients undergoing mastectomy with strong indications (P < .001). Among 114 patients undergoing BCS with weaker indications (ie, elderly) for RT, 80.0% received treatment, and 47.5% received RT among the 164 patients undergoing mastectomy with weaker indications (T1N1, T2N1, or T3N0 disease; P < .001). On multivariate analysis, surgery type (P < .001), indication strength (P < .001), age (P = .005), comorbidity (P < .001), income (P = .03), patient desire to avoid RT (P < .001), level of surgeon involvement in decision to have radiation (P < .001), and SEER site (P < .001) were significantly associated with likelihood of RT receipt.

Conclusion: RT receipt was consistently high across sociodemographic subgroups after BCS but was lower after mastectomy, even among patients with strong indications for treatment, in whom clinical benefit is similar. Surgeon involvement had a strong influence on RT receipt.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Rates of radiotherapy (RT) receipt by surgery type and indication strength. Higher proportions of patients receive RT after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) than after mastectomy, both among those with strong indications and among those with weaker indications. Twenty-three patients had missing information. Data adjusted for age, comorbidity, site, ethnicity, and education.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Rates of radiotherapy (RT) receipt among patients (Pts) with strong indications, by surgery type, preference to avoid RT, and provider involvement level. Among patients with strong indications undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS), even those with a high desire to avoid RT and those reporting lower levels of surgeon involvement in radiation decisions were likely to receive RT. In contrast, among patients with strong indications for RT who underwent mastectomy, a substantial rate of lack of RT receipt was observed in certain subsets, particularly among those expressing high desire to avoid RT who reported lower levels of surgeon involvement in the decision process. Rates adjusted for age, comorbidity, site, ethnicity, and education. Forty-four patients had missing information.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: An overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;366:2087–2106. - PubMed
    1. Lazovich DA, White E, Thomas DB, et al. Underutilization of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy among women with stage I or II breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;266:3433–3438. - PubMed
    1. Farrow DC, Hunt WC, Samet JM. Geographic variation in the treatment of localized breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1097–1101. - PubMed
    1. Nattinger AB, Hoffmann RG, Kneusel RT, et al. Relation between appropriateness of primary therapy for early-stage breast carcinoma and increased use of breast-conserving surgery. Lancet. 2000;356:1148–1153. - PubMed
    1. Du XL, Gor BJ. Racial disparities and trends in radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer in women, 1992 to 2002. Ethn Dis. 2007;17:122–128. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms