Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;55(5):1075-85.
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.150821. Epub 2010 Mar 29.

Ultrasound assessment of flow-mediated dilation

Affiliations

Ultrasound assessment of flow-mediated dilation

Ryan A Harris et al. Hypertension. 2010 May.

Abstract

Developed in 1992, the flow-mediated dilation test is now the most commonly used noninvasive assessment of vascular endothelial function in humans. Since its inception, scientists have refined their understanding of the physiology, analysis, and interpretation of this measurement. Recently, a significant growth of knowledge has added to our understanding and implementation of this clinically relevant research methodology. Therefore, this tutorial provides timely insight into recent advances and practical information related to the ultrasonic assessment of vascular endothelial function in humans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of the essential elements for the ultrasound assessment of FMD.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The image quality of B-mode images using different frequency linear probes. A) 6 MHz, B) 9 MHz, C) 10 MHz, and D) 12 MHz. The magnification illustrates both the intima to intima (I-I) and the media to media (M-M) interfaces. Note: Although there is definitely a visible layer among all images above, using at least a 10 MHz probe offers a very clear identification of the endothelium.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The determination of blood velocity and blood flow using different placements of the Doppler sample gate. A) Outer, B) Middle, C) Inner. Note: the difference in velocity and blood flow among the different placements of the sample gate.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The relationships between flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and different assessments of shear rate to be considered when normalizing FMD. A) FMD vs. peak shear, B) FMD vs. shear AUC until peak diameter, C) FMD vs. total shear AUC for the entire 2 minutes. Inlays for each panel illustrate the corresponding shear rate (shaded) used in the analysis.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Gooch VM, Spiegelhalter DJ, Miller OI, Sullivan ID, Lloyd JK, Deanfield JE. Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet. 1992;340:1111–1115. - PubMed
    1. Uehata A, Lieberman EH, Gerhard MD, Anderson TJ, Ganz P, Polak JF, Creager MA, Yeung AC. Noninvasive assessment of endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery. Vascular Medicine. 1997;2:87–92. - PubMed
    1. Anderson TJ, Uehata A, Gerhard MD. Close relationship of endothelial function in the human coronary and peripheral circulations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:1235–1241. - PubMed
    1. Corretti MC, Anderson TJ, Benjamin EJ, Celermajer D, Charbonneau F, Creager MA, Deanfield J, Drexler H, Gehard-Herman M, Herrington D, Vallance P, Vita J, Vogel R. Guidelines for the Ultrasound Assessment of Endothelial-Dependent Flow-Mediated Vasodilation of the Brachial Artery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:257–265. - PubMed
    1. Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Gooch VM. Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet. 1992;340:1111–1115. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms