Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Apr;60(573):e137-43.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X483904.

Automated electronic reminders to facilitate primary cardiovascular disease prevention: randomised controlled trial

Tim A Holt  1 , Margaret Thorogood, Frances Griffiths, Stephen Munday, Tim Friede, David Stables
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Automated electronic reminders to facilitate primary cardiovascular disease prevention: randomised controlled trial

Tim A Holt et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Primary care databases contain cardiovascular disease risk factor data, but practical tools are required to improve identification of at-risk patients.

Aim: To test the effects of a system of electronic reminders (the 'e-Nudge') on cardiovascular events and the adequacy of data for cardiovascular risk estimation.

Design of study: Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Nineteen general practices in the West Midlands, UK.

Method: The e-Nudge identifies four groups of patients aged over 50 years on the basis of estimated cardiovascular risk and adequacy of risk factor data in general practice computers. Screen messages highlight individuals at raised risk and prompt users to complete risk profiles where necessary. The proportion of the study population in the four groups was measured, as well as the rate of cardiovascular events in each arm after 2 years.

Results: Over 38 000 patients' electronic records were randomised. The intervention led to an increase in the proportion of patients with sufficient data who were identifiably at risk, with a difference of 1.94% compared to the control group (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.38 to 2.50, P<0.001). A corresponding reduction occurred in the proportion potentially at risk but requiring further data for a risk estimation (difference = -3.68%, 95% CI = -4.53 to -2.84, P<0.001). No significant difference was observed in the incidence of cardiovascular events (rate ratio = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.10, P = 0.59).

Conclusion: Automated electronic reminders using routinely collected primary care data can improve the adequacy of cardiovascular risk factor information during everyday practice and increase the visibility of the at-risk population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of a group A message appearing during consultation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The CONSORT flowchart, August 2005.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. British Cardiac Society, British Hypertension Society, Diabetes UK et al. JBS 2: Joint British Societies' guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice. Heart. 2005;91(suppl 5):v1–v52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Lipid modification: cardiovascular risk assessment and the modification of blood lipids for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Clinical Guideline 67. London: NICE; 2008. - PubMed
    1. Department of Health. Quality and Outcomes Framework. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/Primarycare/Primarycarecontracting/QO... (accessed 3 Nov 2009)
    1. Holt TA, Thorogood M, Griffiths F, Munday S. Protocol for the ‘e-Nudge trial’: a randomised controlled trial of electronic feedback to reduce the cardiovascular risk of individuals in general practice [ISRCTN64828380] Trials. 2006;7:11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson KM, Wilson PWF, Odell PM, et al. An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals. Circulation. 1991;83(1):356–362. - PubMed

Publication types