Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb;47(1):205-25.
doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0084.

Patterns of nonresident father contact

Affiliations

Patterns of nonresident father contact

Jacob E Cheadle et al. Demography. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

We used the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 cohort (NLSY79) from 1979 to 2002 and the Children of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (CNLSY) from 1986 to 2002 to describe the number, shape, and population frequencies of U.S. nonresident father contact trajectories over a 14-year period using growth mixture models. The resulting four-category classification indicated that nonresident father involvement is not adequately characterized by a single population with a monotonic pattern of declining contact over time. Contrary to expectations, about two-thirds of fathers were consistently either highly involved or rarely involved in their children's lives. Only one group, constituting approximately 23% of fathers, exhibited a clear pattern of declining contact. In addition, a small group of fathers (8%) displayed a pattern of increasing contact. A variety of variables differentiated between these groups, including the child's age at father-child separation, whether the child was born within marriage, the mother's education, the mother's age at birth, whether the father pays child support regularly, and the geographical distance between fathers and children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Appendix Figure A1.
Appendix Figure A1.
Percentages in Each Contact Response Category for Times 0, 2, 4, and 6 Years After the Father Has Left the Home
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Model Selection Using BIC Criteria
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean and Single-Population Quadratic Growth Model Change in Father Contact Over Time
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Patterns of Father Contact From the Four-Category/Class Model With Population Estimates of the Proportion of Fathers in Each Category/Class

References

    1. Amato PR, Booth A, Johnson DR, Rogers SJ. Alone Together: How Marriage in America Is Changing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2007.
    1. Amato PR, Gilbreth J. “Nonresident Fathers and Children’s Well-being: A Meta-Analysis”. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1999;61:557–73.
    1. Aquilino WS. “Noncustodial Father-Child Relationship From Adolescence Into Young Adulthood”. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2006;68:929–46.
    1. Arditti JA, Keith TZ. “Visitation Frequency, Child Support Payment, and the Father-Child Relationship Postdivorce”. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1993;55:699–712.
    1. Barber J, Evans A.2006“The Intersection Among Unintended, Premarital, and Teenage Childbearing in the U.S.”Report 06-608. Population Studies Center; Ann Arbor, MI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources