Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Jan 19;90(3):187-91.

[Appropriate dosage of unfraction heparin and low molecular weight heparin in hemodialysis patients]

[Article in Chinese]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 20356555
Randomized Controlled Trial

[Appropriate dosage of unfraction heparin and low molecular weight heparin in hemodialysis patients]

[Article in Chinese]
Qing Xiao et al. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. .

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the appropriate dose of unfraction heparin and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in hemodialysis patients.

Methods: Thirty-eight hemodialysis patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into four groups.The initial bolus dose for the Low-dose (LH, n = 10) and high-dose heparin (HH, n = 10) groups were 35 U/kg and 55 U/kg, respectively.The repeated maintenance dose for both groups were 10 U/kg.h and 16 U/kg.h, respectively. Fragmin were administered as single bolus (60 U/kg or 80 U/kg) at 30 minutes before hemodialysis in Low-dose LMWH(LLMWH, n = 10) and High-dose LMWH (HLMW, n = 8) group, respectively. Furthermore, the dialysis circuits in LUFH and LLMWUFH groups were primed with with 4 mg/dl heparinized saline before hemodialysis. Glass bead active clotting time (gbACT), clot rate (CR) and platelet function (PF) were examined using Sonoclot analysator at 0 h, 2 h and the end of hemodialysis at the arterial circuit and 2 h at the venous circuit.

Results: (1) LH and LUFH: the increase of gbACT and decrease of CR at the arterial circuit and the venous circuit at 2 h of hemodialysis were significant compared with baseline. While they recovered at the end of hemodialysis. No difference between the two groups at different time points was found, either. (2) LLMWH: No change were found in gbACT during hemodialysis. CR at the arterial circuit and the venous circuit were significantly decreased at 2 h and recovered at the end of hemodialysis. (3) LLMWUFH: gbACT at the arterial circuit was significantly increased only at 2 h of hemodialysis. CR at the arterial circuit and the venous circuit at 2 h of hemodialysis were significantly decreased and recovered when hemodialysis finished. (4) HH and HLMWH: gbACT were significantly increased and CR were rapidly decreased at both the arterial circuit and venous circuit at 2 h of hemodialysis.

Conclusion: Low-dose heparin was effective and safe as anticoagulant in hemodialysis. Low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin was efficient in anticoagulation to some extent. However, High-dose low-molecular-weight heparin, high-dose heparin and flushing with heparinized saline may increase the risk of hemorrhage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types