Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Jun;27(6):309-16.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-010-9403-x. Epub 2010 Apr 1.

Embryo selection criteria based on morphology VERSUS the expression of a biochemical marker (sHLA-G) and a graduated embryo score: prediction of pregnancy outcome

Dirk J Kotze  1 , Polly Hansen, Levent Keskintepe, Ellen Snowden, Geoffrey Sher, Thinus Kruger
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Embryo selection criteria based on morphology VERSUS the expression of a biochemical marker (sHLA-G) and a graduated embryo score: prediction of pregnancy outcome

Dirk J Kotze et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare pregnancy and implantation rates when embryos are selected based on a single Day 3 (D 3) morphology score vs. a GES score plus sHLA-G expression.

Methods: A prospective randomized study (n = 214) undergoing fresh ICSI cycles. Embryos were selected for transfer based on either Day 3 morphology score (Group A) or GES-scoring plus sHLA-G expression (Group B).

Results: Clinical [35/107 (33%) vs. 52/107 (49%)] and ongoing pregnancy [20/107 (19%) vs. 52/107 (49%)] rates were significantly different between Group A and Group B (p < 0.05). Implantation rates were not significantly different between Group A [52/353 (15%)] and Group B [73/417 (18%)] (p < 0.05). The number of pregnancies lost during the first trimester was nearly 12 times higher in Group A [25/52 (48%)].

Conclusion: The miscarriage rate was significantly lower in Group B than Group A and the pregnancy results were superior when embryos were selected based on GES plus sHLA-G expression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT statement flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Fetal loss rates
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cummins J, Breen T, Harrison K. A formula for scoring human embryo growth rates in vitro fertilization: its value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison with visual estimates of embryo quality. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1986;3:284–95. doi: 10.1007/BF01133388. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Puissant F, Rysselberge M, Barlow P. Embryo scoring as a prognostic tool in IVF treatment. Hum Reprod. 1987;2:705–8. - PubMed
    1. Staessens C, Camus M, Bollen N. The relationship between embryo quality and the occurrence of multiple pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:626–30. - PubMed
    1. Steer C, Mills C, Tan S. The cumulative embryo score: a predictive embryo scoring technique to select the optimal number of embryos to transfer in an in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:117–9. - PubMed
    1. Roseboom T, Vermeiden J. Evaluation of embryo scoring systems and their value in predicting in vitro fertilization outcome. Assist Reprod Rev. 1995;5:53–9.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources